No Judge who is corrupt, who condones corruption in others, can possibly remains on the Bench.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Access 2009 - Judicial Selection panel




Access 2009 - Judicial Selection panel
VCOG


Access 2009 panel examines judicial selection in Virginia



Richmond trial attorney Coleman Allen told a VCOG audience that he's practiced in both Virginia and West Virginia. He's seen good and bad judges in each state, and has concluded that both states' judicial selection processes (West Virginia elects; Virginia appoints) have merits and drawbacks.
The final panel of Access 2009 focused on judicial selection in Virginia. Moderated by George Mason University Counsel, and VCOG board member Tom Moncure, the panel looked at both the policy behind Virginia's current practice and the political reality of changing it.
Staunton delegate Chris Saxman said he liked the way Staunton area lawmakers are able to get a lot of citizen input about potential judge candidates at the trial level, though he admitted that at the appellate level, legislators are often asked to vote on people they have no personal knowledge of. He also noted that the likelihood of the General Assembly giving up its current power to interview and recommend candidates is next to nil.

Fairfax County Clerk of Court John Frey (Left) says he wishes there was more public input in the way candidates for judgeship are selected.



Larry Roberts, currently counselor to Tim Kaine as DNC chair and previously counselor to Tim Kaine as governor, said he appreciated the power the governor has to fill certain appointments without legislative approval, but also said it wasn't be the time to put all judicial appointments into the governor's hands.
Fairfax County Clerk of Court John Frey discussed how bad judges can sometimes stay on the bench too long. He noted that an adjusted pension-accrual process may be a way to lure older lawyers with more court (and life) experience to the bench. Frey also complimented Staunton for soliciting citizen input, saying he wished there were more public input in his area of the state.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Senate Amendment 2588 passed on a vote of 68-30 - Stop Family Violence


Great News!! Senate Amendment 2588 passed on a vote of 68-30

Together, we can www.stopfamilyviolence.org
Irene Weiser

To see how your legislators voted click here
" It seems like all Democrats Voted "YES" & all Republicans Voted "NO" !!!! Why am I not Surprised??????"

Thanks for your quick response!! Here's the press release from Senator Franken's office.

For Immediate Release:October 6th, 2009 Contact:Jess McIntoshJess_mcintosh@franken.senate.gov 202.725.6787


Franken's Proposal To Guarantee Sexual Assault Victims Their Day In Court Passes By 68 - 30, Amendment Offered in Honor of former KBR employee Jamie Leigh Jones Passes the Senate WASHINGTON, DC [10/6/09] - Today, the amendment offered by U.S. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) to stop funding defense contractors who deny assault victims their day in court passed the United States Senate by a vote of 68 - 30.

Last Thursday, Sen. Franken introduced an amendment (S.2588) to the FY2010 Defense Appropriations Bill that would restrict funding to defense contractors who commit employees to mandatory binding arbitration in the case of sexual assault. The legislation, endorsed by 61 women's, labor and public interest groups, was inspired by the story of Jamie Leigh Jones, who watched the vote from the Senate gallery today.

Jones was a 19-yr-old employee of defense contractor KBR (formerly a Halliburton subsidiary) stationed in Iraq who was gang raped by her co-workers and imprisoned in a shipping container when she tried to report the crime.

Her father and U.S. Rep. Ted Poe (R-Tex.), worked together to secure her safe return to the United States, but once she was home, she learned a fine-print clause in her KBR contract banned her from taking her case to court, instead forcing her into an "arbitration" process that would be run by KBR itself. Just today, Halliburton filed a petition for a rehearing en banc in the 5th Circuit Court, which means that Jamie's fight is far from over. "I'm proud of what we accomplished today," said Sen. Franken. "Victims of sexual assault deserve their day in court and no corporation should be able to deny them that right. Jamie's courage in telling her story will help women all over this country and I'm honored to have been a part of that.""I am highly honored that Senator Franken and his wife have created this amendment to ensure that others do not have to endure the suffering that I have," said Jones. "This amendment makes all the hard times that I have gone through, when going public with such a personal tragedy, worth every tear shed from telling and retelling my horrific experience. I know this amendment will save so many in the future."Specifically, Sen. Franken's amendment:
Does not require contractors to change or modify existing employment contracts. It only bars funds to contractors who continue to use these mandatory arbitration clauses in their employment contracts.
Narrowly targets the most egregious violations and applies to defense contracts, many of which are administered abroad, where women are the most vulnerable and least likely to have support resources. The amendment will apply to many contractors that have already demonstrated their incompetence in efficiently carrying out defense contracts, and have further demonstrated their unwillingness and their inability to protect women from sexual assault.
Applies to claims arising out of sexual assault, like assault & battery (including rape), intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent hiring, retention, and supervision, as well as Title VII civil rights claims, which were specifically designed to protect vulnerable groups in the workplace.
Leading Minnesota and national organizations who have endorsed Sen. Franken's amendment include the Minnesota Women Lawyers, the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault, the Sexual Violence Center, Minnesota NOW, Advocates for Human Rights, the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence, the National Women's Law Center, the National Partnership for Women and Families, the American Association of University Women, the National Council of La Raza, the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, and the Consumer Federation of America. A full list of the 61 endorsing organizations is attached."Sexual violence is about a person trying to exercise power and control over another person through unwanted sexual contact and violence," said Pam Zeller, Executive Director of the Sexual Violence Center. "In arbitration the intent is to arrive at an agreement. This agreement does not have to be equitable in order to be resolved. It is also not intended to resolve a criminal matter.

Sexual harassment and sexual violence inherently have an imbalance of power. Submitting a victim of sexual harassment, or sexual assault, to a process of arbitration is a revictimization of the victim, and minimizes the seriousness of the crime of sexual assault. The proposed amendment by Senator Franken will protect victims of sexual harassment and sexual violence from being revictimized through the arbitration process." "This amendment reflects a critically important step in safeguarding the rights of those who have experienced discrimination in the form of sexual violence, harassment, and stalking," said Donna Dunn, Executive Director of the Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault. "We know that justice for victims of violence often seems elusive. It is very important that each person have the right to assess and choose the options that they believe best fit their needs. This amendment is a giant step in that direction." "No survivor of sexual assault should be denied the ability to seek justice," said Terri Poore, Policy Chair of the National Alliance to End Sexual Violence. "Asking a victim to enter into arbitration with someone who raped her or a company that wouldn't protect her is outrageous and sends a clear message that such violence is simply not taken seriously." Minnesota Organizations Endorsing the Franken Amendment (SA 2588)Advocates for Human Rights.

Monday, October 5, 2009

List of Judges and their terms expiration dates - NINETEENTH CIRCUIT COUT - FAIRFAX

NINETEENTH CIRCUIT Courts - Fairfax County
Location: Fairfax Circuit Court
4110 Chain Bridge Road
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Tel. (703) 246-4111

JUDGES MARKED IN RED SHOULD NOT BE REAPPOINTED & THOSE JUDGES WHO ARE NOT UP FOR THIS YEAR, BUT STILL IN RED INK, SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.


Judges: Jan Lois Brodie....term expires 2/13/09
David S. Schell .................term expires 2/13/09
Gaylord L. Finch, Jr..........term expires 6/30/09
Jane Marum Roush ..........term expires 6/30/09
Randy I. Bellows ...............term expires 1/31/11
*Dennis J. Smith................term expires 5/31/11
David T. Stitt .....................term expires 6/30/11
Michael P. McWeeny .........term expires 2/29/12
Leslie M. Alden ..................term expires 7/31/12
Jonathan C. Thacher .........term expires 4/30/14
Charles J. Maxfield.............term expires 1/31/15
R. Terrence Ney..................term expires 1/31/15
Marcus D. Williams............term expires 1/31/15
Robert J. Smith .................term expires 1/31/16
Bruce D. White ..................term expires 1/15/16


Saturday, October 3, 2009

Virginia's Judicial Selection Process





Prompted apparently by a pair of articles in the Bristol Herald-Courier, here and here, several of my fellow Virginia bloggers have posts today about the pros and cons of the way that state-level, and especially trial court, judges are selected and appointed in Virginia.
Virginia is virtually unique in the United States in that is judicial selection and reappointment process is entirely controlled by the state legislature and goes back to the Reconstruction era, as the Herald notes:
No other state gives legislators more power in selecting judges than Virginia – one of just two states where legislature seats judges. In fact, judicial candidates must have the backing of at least one local legislator to be considered.
Though the process has evolved from the dominant party in the General Assembly ramming their preferred candidates through to the bench, there have been few broad reforms to the process, and it remains largely the same system as it was following the Reconstruction era.
A shifting political landscape in 1995 yielded the first administrative changes to the system, which sprung from a 20-20 split in the Senate between Democrats and Republicans. Instead of the majority party picking judges in closed-door caucuses, the divided assembly gave rise to a form of senatorial courtesy, which shifted the authority of nominating judicial candidates to local legislative delegations.
According to Senate rules, each lawmaker that represents part of a judicial circuit must sign a nominating form for a candidate, who would then automatically be placed on that chamber’s judicial appointment bill. If one senator withholds support, as one lawmaker did this session, the nomination is opened up to a floor vote – which would generally hew to the position of the senator whose party is dominant.
Scott White raises concerns about the propriety of the Assembly, which is made up of a lot of attorneys, choosing the judges that they and their fellow attorneys appear before:
One of my biggest concerns over the process we use to appoint and place our judges has in fact been that it is the General Assembly that does it.
A large part of our legislative body is made of of lawyers who have active practices in the districts they represent.
(…)
So what we have are legislators who are appointing judges and writing the laws that those judges are going to hold people’s actions against. And if that isn’t enough, those same lawyers are the ones who are going to be defending clients against the very laws they wrote and in front of the judges they appointed.


Smyth County Conservative, on the other hand, thinks that the current system works better than any of the alternatives:

I strongly favor Virginia’s current system of the General Assembly electing judges. I do not think it would be a good idea to allow judges to be popularly elected as it would inject judges into the public political process. I don’t think judges should be running public campaigns while in office. It wouldn’t be good for a judge to run a campaign by putting up signs with the likes of ”tough on crime” and other slogans as this could be a potential conflict with their duties.
And Kilo agrees:
While the process is not perfect, it is the best way to seat the bench. The process is not much different than the feds use. Many of us have seen first hand in Kentucky what happens when judges are elected by popular vote. That process makes you wonder what candidate is supported by drug dealers, pot growers, contractors, etc. Think about it.
If you want another example of what can go wrong when the judiciary succumbs to the electoral process, you don’t need to look much further than the Supreme Court of Alabama and Former Chief Judge Roy Moore, who (regardless of the merits of his views) acted more like a politician on the bench than a Judge.
There are ways to improve the current system but instituting the types of merit-based reviews that are currently performed for candidates for the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals as well as judicial appointments arising in certain jurisdictions such as Fairfax and Prince William Counties, but that’s as far as I think we should go.
If you think there’s a conflict of interest now, what do you think would happen if Judges were soliciting campaign contributions from the very lawyers who appear before them ?

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The Court violated the Rights of Child


Child Abuse is ALSO committed by Government Social Workers who SNATCH a beautiful baby based on FALSE CHARGES
of "starving" the child, "failure to thrive" Child Abuse,
when the FACTS of Weights and Dates PROVE no Child Abuse.
The Foster Parents were Politically Connected to the County Chairman, and later Court Clerk.
The Court violated the Rights of Child, ...........Mother and Father.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

I lost physical custody of my son to a man with mental illness and an arrest record.

MOTHERS REAL STORIES
Comment on our article:
The most dangerous Guardian Ad Litem in Fairfax Arlington County

Deborah S. Olin G.A.L
Dawn Davis (not verified)
at 15:45 on September 29th, 2009


He pulled a knife on me and locked himself in the bathroom. He kept yelling that he wished he was dead and wished he had a gun. When I tried to leave with our son in my arms, he swung open the door and tried to pull our son from my arms into the bathroom with the knife.

I am learning that my story is all too familiar. My divorce case was heard in Suffolk, Virginia (3 hours southwest of Fairfax).
I have lived in Northern VA for a little over two years now, since my ex-husband threw me and our 20 month old son at the time out of our home.

He pulled a knife on me and locked himself in the bathroom. He kept yelling that he wished he was dead and wished he had a gun. When I tried to leave with our son in my arms, he swung open the door and tried to pull our son from my arms into the bathroom with the knife.

During the first hearing two years ago, I was awarded full custody and he got supervised visitation. He was also ordered to go to a psychiatrist for an evaluation, which he turned out to be diagnosed with Major Depression and Adjustment Disorder.

A Guardian ad Litem, T. Kirk Pretlow was assigned to the case at the request of my husband's attorney. My attorney objected, requesting the judge appoint his own, but the judge turned the request down.
From that point on and for two years, the GAL was a nightmare for me. He never called me, interviewed me. or even called my son's daycare and doctor for interviews. He kept threatening me to "talk" to my husband or it would result in me losing custody.
I replied to him (through email) that I had no problems talking to my husband, but only about our son. My husband wanted to talk to me everyday, and cried to the GAL whenever I didn't citing that I was not communicating.
To make matters worse, my husband assaulted my mom during a visitation drop off and was convicted in August 2008.
The GAL told me that it was my fault for the assault, even though I wasn't even there. He always blamed me for my husband's outbursts. I reported the GAL to the Virginia Sate Board in November 2008 and wrote a letter to the judge. By rule, they notify the attorney when a complaint is filed.
I was hoping this would get him to remove himself from the case, make the judge remove him or at least make him do his job, but it did not. He said that my son should stay with me, but during the final trial on August 31, 2009, he stood up and said that he "changed his mind." He said that I needed to "mellow out" and I needed to have my son taken away from me to teach me a lesson and make me talk to my husband.
The judge had said earlier in the case that he would wait for the GAL's opinion before making a ruling on custody.
The parenting evaluator also changed his mind. His first report recommended that I keep physical custody, with my son not spending more than a week from me. Well, in February 2009, he was paid double by my husband to conduct a new evaluation and had already conducted a home visit before even calling me to tell me. His name is Dr. Brian K. Wald.
In court, he admitted to being paid $6000 by my husband and $1000 for his appearance. He even lied about when he spoke to me.
I lost physical custody of my son to a man with mental illness and an arrest record. I would ask myself how o why this happened, but I know how, and only the good Lord knows why.
I believe that this is a temporary situation to allow me to reach out to others and share my story. Shedding light on our judicial system is the only way there will truly be justice. There are so many corrupt attorneys and judges out there, that to try a remove them all on your own would take forever. But to bring the stories together and shed the light on the bigger issue;
Children being displaced and losing precious years for no reason. If you want to share your story, you have a pair of ears ready to listen. I plan to write an editorial to publish of the many stories out there that are all too familiar and devastating.

Monday, September 21, 2009

My life is currently in danger because of corrupted judge Bruce D. White


My life is currently in danger because of corrupted judge Bruce D. White! I don’t know whether I’d still exist in the next minute or not.............


Should Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County, Virginia Circuit court be removed from the Bench?

Anh Pham:

Comment/ Petition Signed No.: 209/19/09


Yes, immediately!


COMMENTS:

My name is Anh Pham. I am a female student of Lord Fairfax Community College. My life is currently in danger because of this corrupted judge! I don’t know whether I’d still exist in the next minute or not, but I wish to send my vote to you for true Justice to be done. I’m available for further questions at ..............@gmail.com.

Any day that this horrible man is still in his position spells out danger to all citizens!

Saturday, September 19, 2009

I was insulted and discriminated by Judge Bruce D. White for no reason


I just experienced another Immoral Judgment of Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County, on the Friday Motion Day 9/18/2009.
We Asked...........................
Should Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County, Virginia Circuit court be removed from the Bench?

YES: Yes. Immediately.
09/20/09
COMMENTS:

My name is Lily Guan. I was just experienced another Immoral Judgment of Judge Bruce White on the Friday Motion Day 9/18/2009.

I was insulted for no reason, discriminated for just being an Oriental American woman, and “judged before trial” by this horrible Judge.

If any of you wish to obtain more detail on my case, please feel free to contact me at my email address ......@consultant.com


Any day that Judge BRUCE D. WHITE exists in the court room,...that means, JUSTICE does not ...........

Friday, September 11, 2009

Judge Ramona Taylor Censured by the Supreme Court

Ramos is escorted into the courtroom of Chief Judge Ramona D. Taylor in Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court in Virginia Beach.

Supreme Court censures Va. Beach judge
November 5th, 2009 ·



Virginia Beach Juvenile & Domestic Relations Judge Ramona Taylor is censured by the Supreme Court of Virginia today for thwarting a juvenile defendant’s right to appeal the judge’s bond ruling.


In 2007, Taylor denied bond for a 15-year-old repeat offender who admitted assaulting a younger boy. Taylor then wrote in her bond order that the order was “non-appealable” and emphasized that language when the clerk inquired about the issue of appeal.


Noting that, under Virginia law, every bond decision is appealable, a five-member majority of the Supreme Court holds that Taylor violated the judicial canons when she acted to prevent an appeal of her order. “A judge may not prevent the appeal of his or her own decisions,” Justice LeRoy Millette wrote for the majority.
The defendant was in detention for 9 days until a circuit court ordered the matter appealed.
By Peter Vieth

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Lisa Deel accused of manipulation, obstruction, negligence, willful and repeated breach,

Lisa Ferry Deel Story in:
Mommy Go Bye Bye



Stockbroker and Financial Advisor Lisa Ferry Deel of Ashburn

and Belmont Country and Golf Club, in Virginia's Loudoun County, is accused of manipulation, obstruction, negligence, willful and repeated breach, and “a failure to execute” in a 2008 case before CBOE, or the Chicago Board Options Exchange. Deel is the same woman who 10 years ago began taking away, with intent to abduct, the daughter of the creator of the Mommy Go Bye Bye blog by force and by use of manipulation, obstruction, negligence, willful and repeated breach, and “a failure to execute.”
The French reserve for such people a special noun ...

Garce ...................

Attorney general nominees clash over ethics issue


By Olympia MeolaPublished: September 17, 2009


Democratic attorney general nominee Stephen C. Shannon, a delegate from Fairfax County, cited the employment controversy involving a state lawmaker yesterday while pitching his plan to strengthen government accountability.
He also dinged his opponent for not calling on the lawmaker to resign.
But Republican nominee Ken Cuccinelli, a state senator from Fairfax County, shot back, saying: "This is a pure political stunt on his part."
Del. Phillip A. Hamilton, R-Newport News, is under fire for pursuing a job at a new teaching center at Old Dominion University before he put in a $500,000 budget amendment for the center's creation. Speaker of the House William J. Howell, R-Stafford, has asked the House Ethics Advisory Panel to investigate whether Hamilton violated the state's Conflict of Interest Act.
Shannon reminded reporters yesterday in a conference call that he was the first statewide candidate to call on Hamilton to resign. Cuccinelli has said it should be left up to the voters of Hamilton's district.
"Our next attorney general cannot be ambivalent toward corruption in government. He must be a steadfast defender of the public trust," Shannon said.
But Cuccinelli said one possible outcome of the ethics panel is to refer the case to the attorney general.
"I'm not going to call for [a resignation] because that would suggest a conclusion in an ongoing case that I may end up having a role analogous to a judge in," he said. "[Shannon] doesn't care what the law is and that should bother Virginians a great deal."
Shannon's plan calls for a commission to review and make recommendations on an overhaul of conflict-of-interest laws and increasing the penalty for lawmakers and government employees who violate such laws, in some cases.
He also wants to increase transparency in government by compiling information for the public on the Internet, he said.
Cuccinelli said he has been fighting to make the state's budget more transparent -- including through legislation in 2008 to create a database so people could easily search for state budget items.
"I've been one of the biggest proponents of open government," he said.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Open-government conference to focus on Va. judiciary


Open-government conference to focus on Va. judiciary
Richmond Times Dispatch

By Michael Martz
Published: September 7, 2009


Virginia's judiciary will be the top topic of an annual conference this fall on opening the working of government to public view.
The judicial selection process, controlled by the General Assembly, and a hot-button proposal to make jurors anonymous in criminal cases will be debated by panelists at Access 2009, a conference convened by the Virginia Coalition for Open Government.
The judicial topics will occupy two of the four panels on the second day of the conference, scheduled for Oct. 15 and 16 at the Stonewall Jackson Hotel in Staunton. The other two panel discussions will examine whether President Barack Obama has lived up to his promises of more transparent government and the workings of Virginia's Freedom of Information Act.


"The focus is access," said Megan Rhyne, executive director of the organization, whose members include the news media, librarians and genealogists, as well as advocates for greater openness in government at all levels.

The executive and legislative branches of government are often the source of concerns about lack of public access to their government, but this year the judicial branch is drawing attention because of the way Virginia selects judges and the potential for juror names being kept anonymous in all criminal cases.
A group of citizens, known as the "Pitchfork Rebellion," have called this year for a public examination of judicial selection. Virginia is one of two states in which the legislature elects judges, but direct election isn't the primary issue under debate.

The group has expressed more concern about the lack of openness in the way judicial candidates are evaluated and chosen, and it wants a public forum on whether to change the selection process and how.

At the same time, the Virginia Supreme Court has raised concerns, especially in the news media, with a proposal to seal the names of jurors in all criminal cases. The proposal, made by the Advisory Committee on Rules of the Court, would go much further than a law adopted by the General Assembly last year to allow judges to limit disclosure of information about jurors in cases in which "good cause" has been established.

Another panel will discuss the Obama administration's record on transparency in matters ranging from spending under the stimulus bill to withholding of logs of visitors to the White House on major matters of public policy, such as health-care reform.
The final panel will discuss Virginia's Freedom of Information Act, which is a primary tool that the public uses to get information that government may not want them to have.
The FOIA also is the subject of a series of one-day seminars planned this fall by the Virginia Freedom of Information Advisory Council. Six one-day seminars are planned: next Monday in Richmond; Sept. 28 in Staunton; Sept. 29 in Abingdon; Oct. 6 in Suffolk; Oct. 27 in Manassas; and Nov. 2 in Richmond.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Jim Lafferty - FOX News Reporter Comment to the Founder of Misconduct in Virginia Family Courts

Jim Lafferty - FOX News Reporter
Wrote on August 2nd, 2009 - 10:37 am

Dear .............Thanks for the courageous stand you, Dr. Ariel King and others are taking against the "justice delayed and denied" by some judges here in Virginia.
The light of public attention must be shone on these little cliques of judges and Lawyers who play the system for personal benefit. Virginia's children are fortunate to have a devoted group of courageous Moms like you to speak for them and call the public's attention to their suffering and Judicial indifference.

You are Terrific !

............Responded on August 2nd, 2009 - 6:29 pm

Jim - Thank you so very much for your kind message.

I saw you on the Fox news and I also think that you are doing such a outstanding job.

As you know, Virginian Moms abused by Judicial system have left with no other option but going public in order to disclose the System & Judges corruptions. We are determining to keep on campaigning and fighting against injustice.

We suffered a lot ..............

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

It's like Mafia is running the legal system in State of Virginia

Mafia is running the legal system in Virginia........

We published this Article in "Now Public.com" & received this chilling Story, about another Abused Mother by Virginia Judicial System.

Tracie Outland wrote:
at 08:28 on August 31st, 2009

In answer to this Question:
“Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to change the method of re-appointing state judges from confirmation by the legislature to retention election by the voters?

YES I also believe a complaint on a judge, lawyer, GAL, therapist needs immediate clean up crew and immediate review and correction of the court files where the hate crime is committed, and immediate punishment and removal of certain individuals committing organized crimes which are targeted at slowly killing a particular individual that they have targeted, and are using the legal court system to slowly kill or remove, create underlying circumstances to come about and even making that particular individual all of sudden have a criminal history where that person never had a criminal history until they walked into juvenile court.
Juvenile court is being used as a beating room against mothers who want to exercise their freedom of speech, want to write to the VA state bar, Judges judicial review committee, and when this individual writes and speaks out about it, the false charges start coming in, and they quickly take the children with no real legitimate reason to do so.
THEY SIMPLY JUST DO WHAT THEY WANT.

The Judge, GAL, Lawyers both sides, therapist cover each others backs, and are using the legal system and think that because juvenile records are closed to the public that they can fool around with made up motions, orders that never existed. It has gotten so bad that the Mafia is running the legal system.
Like my lawyer told me, I'M A LAWYER, and laugh when a letter was wrote about their criminal behaviors.
That is when they want you dead or in jail, because they don't want their secrets told, especially in writing, and they don't want other peers laughing at them behind their backs.

I am homeless, sleeping in my truck, last night my supper was out of the can, cold canned food, using a gift card from xmas to take showers at the gym, having my clothes stole out of the back of the truck, BUT HEY DCSE is going to do their part and collect for the father who just won in court, got the kids, him involved in hitting mom with truck, mom being beat up the next day, false kidnapping charge mom put in Culpeper news over 6 times and picture put in paper for most wanted with kidnapping across the front of picture, oh and mom was aired on channel 26 with kidnapping across the front of my picture-all for justice for the father to make me look like a criminal when I had full custody of the children at the time, false assault and battery charge, false capias in Albermarle county-even though I had never lived in that county-who would have known I was suppose to been arrested hauled to Albermarle jail and never see the light of day due to many other charges underlying that I did not know about, by the way during this time he kidnapped the children for real and would not let them come back and judge did nothing just laughed, false show causes, even though mom had only made $2,500 in 2007, and no income from then to now, so they imputed mom income when mom wrote letters about them trying to put criminal charges on me and showed down fathers income in court since 2003, and DCSE is withholding my only income I could possibly get and it is from Germania financial aid check I was going to use to find a room with a shower, but instead they gave to the father who makes $131,000 a year, and mom has nothing, slowly softly killing me. The fathers laughs, normal for his violent behavior because the father has GAL Michael Sharman Esq. Culpeper VA, Judge F. Somerville Culpeper VA, Judge D. Payne/Mediator (interrelated family member) Fauquier Culpeper VA, Janet Lynn Ours Esq.(interrelated family member) Prince William Co VA, Gwen Corley Winchester VA Therapist, and had my attorney Paul Morrison Esq. Fauquier VA due to him being scared of Judge D. Payne/Mediator (interrelated family member) and my attorney scared because of a case where Judge Payne hurt my sister Sheila Day.
Family on Family.
Of course they would win in court with this amount of people to help Brian Cable ex husband Robert E. Crowell ex husband. Void abinitio is what this is called, organized hate crime to create underlying outcomes to accomplish their goals.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Deborah S. Olin JD - G.A.L - Professional Judge Shopper


- The whole (Deborah S. Olin) family has serious anger/alcohol issues,using people…..yes Narcissism w/ a Cap N!


-She (Deborah S. Olin) married a Court Security Guy. Nice shaved headman named PJ.
(Authur - That would explain why she always gets so close to the Fathers in Child Custody cases and distroys Mothers lives.)


-Why she never had kids ..not going to question it, but I am concerned about her niece Hannah.


We published this Article in MGBB & thought to share some of the
Emails received in regards of:
Deborah S. Olin JD - G.A.L - Professional Judge Shopper
Join us for class act against Deborah S. Olin - G.A.L Arlington, Fairfax County Courts
Fit-Loving-NonOffending-Mothers-Abused-By-Judges in Northern Virginia courtrooms would like to hear from more victims of lawyer and guardian ad litem Deborah S. Olin. Please email va.justlaw@live.com.
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:38:43 -0700>
From: @yahoo.com> Subject: Deborah S. Olin>
To: va.justlaw@live.com>

Hi I'm ……, and I'm a bit blown away by this (Article) on Deborah S. Olin. It
does not surprise me.
Meanwhile all kinds of other Olin family funk that just keeps turning up..The whole family has serious anger/alcohol issues,using people…..yes Narcissism w/ a Cap N!

Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:09:44 -0700 Subject: Deborah S. Olin
To:
va.justlaw@live.com
She had been married once...and her latest ex/or?
She married a Court Security Guy.
Nice shaved headman named PJ.
He too probably has a story or 2.unless you already found him?Why she never had kids ..not going to question it, but I am concerned about her niece Hannah


Sent: Friday 05/08/09 10:27 PM
Subject: Deborah S. Olin

Can you tell me more about this suit? I've had problems but I need to be careful about any info getting out to her. Thanks.

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Delegate Phil Hamilton should immediately resign his House of Delegates seat.


Ranking GOP leaders formally requested an ethics investigation into the actions of Newport News Republican Del. Phillip Hamilton on Monday in the face of growing outcry about the influential legislator's $40,000-a-year job at Old Dominion University.
House Speaker William J. Howell called for a state inquiry the same day that Democrats Creigh Deeds and Jody Wagner - candidates for governor and lieutenant governor, respectively - said Hamilton should immediately resign his House of Delegates seat.
Later Monday, Republicans Bob McDonnell, who is running for governor, and Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling issued similar statements indicating that it seems best for Hamilton to resign, given the circumstances.
Late Monday night, Hamilton continued to resist calls for his resignation, and he voiced his support for an ethics panel to examine his actions.
Last week, ODU released e-mails showing that Hamilton secured $500,000 a year in state funding for ODU's Center for Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership while asking for a job for himself. He and university leaders agreed last week to end his employment.
In a statement, Howell said, "It is important to me and the citizens in whose name all delegates serve to know whether Delegate Hamilton's activities in this matter were legal and in keeping with expected standards of conduct for lawmakers." Howell, a Stafford County Republican, also noted in the statement that other House leaders support that position.
Virginia's conflict-of-interest law bars lawmakers from accepting money for services performed within the scope of their legislative duties. Violation is a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine.
Any formal request for an ethics inquiry of a state delegate triggers a review by a five-member House ethics advisory panel, which can forward its findings to the attorney general for possible prosecution. Ordinarily, such reviews are confidential.
House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry, urged Republican leaders to have a committee of legislators conduct a public investigation instead.
Full Story here

The Role of the Guardian Ad Litem

F E A T U R E S F A M I L Y L A W
The Role of the Guardian Ad Litem
in Custody Cases
by Cheshire I’Anson Eveleigh and Mona S. Flax

As family law practitioners who try custody cases, we found inconsistencies in the role of guardians ad litem after interviewing family law practitioners throughout the Commonwealth and in other jurisdictions.
This was not a scientific sampling, but an overview to illustrate the need for standardization
of the gaurdian’s role.
The role of the guardian differs greatly across the Commonwealth. This article is
designed to address issues facing guardians as they struggle with defining their role and to make our suggestions on how the role of the guardian can be better defined.
The court recognizes guardians ad litem as officers of the courtand expects all to adhere to the standards set forth above. Thecourt reserves the right to remove and/or suspend guardians fromthe list as appropriate and will take into account the guidelinesand guardian’s compliance therewith in making such decisions.
1 - Appointment of the Guardian Ad Litem
2 - The Pre-interview and Interview Processing
3 - The Home Visit
4 - Interview of Collateral Sources
5 - The Requirement of a Written Report
6 - The Necessity for Written Standards
7 - General Guardian Ad Litem Standards
8 - Enforcement of the Guardian Ad Litem Guidelines
9 - The Court’s Role
10-Guidelines and Standards from Outside the Commonwealth
11-Conclusion

Saturday, August 22, 2009

Albo Must Go.........


Delegate Dave Albo (R)

Fairfax and chairman of the House Courts of Justice Committee



Recently, Del. Dave Albo, Chair of the Courts of Justice Committee, was interviewed regarding a dispute over a Circuit Court Judgeship in the mostly Republican jurisdiction of Virginia Beach. In that article he was quoted as follows:


Del. Dave Albo, R-Fairfax and chairman of the House Courts of Justice Committee, said that "we pretty much let the local delegation decide" about the appointment of local judges."Portsmouth judge's reappointment could be in jeopardy," Virginia Pilot, Jan. 17,

2007We at Albo Must Go found this statement interesting. It was only two years ago that Del. Dave Albo personally intervened in the appointment of a Circuit Court judge in the City of Alexandria, overrulled the local delegation and tried to put his friend on the bench. What did Del. Dave Albo say back then?


"We believe it's our prerogative to select who we want, in spite of the local delegation's wishes," said Del. David B. Albo (R-Fairfax), a member of the House Courts of Justice Committee, which takes part in selecting judges.

He wasinstrumental in choosing Fairfax lawyer Timothy Battle to be the House Republicans' nominee."House, Senate Part Ways on Court Seat," Washington Post, Metro, B6, March 6, 2004.
Not one Democrat who is complaining now ever stood up when we were the minority and said that the system they used was unfair," said Del. David B. Albo (R-Fairfax), who has consistently said that it is his party's responsibility to have direct influence on judicial nominations, particularly in districts such as Alexandria that have Democratic majorities."Warner Makes New Pick for Circuit Court," Washington Post, Metro, B1 (June 8, 2004)Del. Dave Albo loves to wields power for the sake of maximizing his own power - not doing things in the best interest of the people. Whether it means voting to inflict political payback by keeping a well-respected moderate Republican education expert off William & Mary's Board of Trustees for endorsing a Democrat (retired Republican Delegate Jim Dillard) or keeping a labor community leader out of a cabinet appointment, Del. Dave Albo rationalizes abusing his own power to maximize he and the Republican Party's own partisan ends.Why doesn't the press ever mention this blatant hypocrisy in their reporting?
Posted by George Mason at 1/19/2007 05:02:00 PM

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Immoral Judgement by Judge Bruce D. White - Washington Post

Now Public.com

Full Story here
Another Immoral Judgment by:
Merciless, Hardhearted Fairfax County Judge Bruce D. White
Drunk Driver Gets 15 Years For Fatal Wrong-Way Crash

The sentence for Alfredo Martinez Rivera, 31, was imposed by FairfaxCircuit Court Judge Bruce D. White and was one of the stiffest penalties imposed in Fairfax for a traffic death in many years,

involuntary manslaughter…. Virginia's voluntary sentencing guidelines recommended a range of three to nine years in prison.


Tags:

Another Immoral Judgement by Judge Bruce D. White - Washington Post


Article from: The Washington Post
Article date: March 7, 2009
Author:
Tom Jackman - Washington Post Staff Writer

Another Immoral Judgment by:
Merciless, Hardhearted Fairfax County Judge Bruce D. White
Drunk Driver Gets 15 Years For Fatal Wrong-Way Crash

The sentence for Alfredo Martinez Rivera, 31, was imposed by Fairfax Circuit Court Judge Bruce D. White and was one of the stiffest penalties imposed in Fairfax for a traffic death in many years,
involuntary manslaughter…. Virginia's voluntary sentencing guidelines recommended a range of three to nine years in prison
. Full Story here.

Wrongly convicted Norfolk man to get $633,000 from Va.


Comes from Virginia lawmakers who ushered legislation through the General Assembly's one-day special session Wednesday.
about $633,000 that legislators agreed to award him in Wednesday's special session in compensation for his wrongful imprisonment.

Judge Sharon Keller is charged with professional misconduct.



Judge Sharon Keller is charged with professional misconduct.

Investigating Judge Keller
New York Times


Sharon Keller, a Texas appellate court judge, made headlines in 2007 when she was reported to have ordered the court clerk’s office to close promptly at 5 p.m., preventing a death-row inmate from filing an emergency appeal. The inmate was executed. A Texas legislator is now trying to impeach Judge Keller for dereliction of duty in that case. A legislative inquiry is long overdue. more............

Also on BBC News

Tuesday, 18 August 2009 07:38 UK

US judge 'ignored death row plea'


Judge Sharon Keller is charged with professional misconduct.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Americans Murdering Their Judges, and the US Crisis of Judicial Corruption

Thanks to progressive national radio host Thom Hartmann of the USA, for calling this article "brilliant", and to the reform group JAIL 4 Judges for saying this article was "the best and most inclusive article we have found written on the subject of the cover-up of judicial corruption."

Americans Murdering Their Judges, and the US Crisis of Judicial Corruption
by Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs)

In the headlines are the appalling news stories of Americans carrying out murderous attacks on judges and their families. In a matter of days, one judge was shot and killed in his own courtroom, while another judge had family members brutally murdered in their home.These news stories are, however, related to another news story, which is the most taboo subject of the American media - the expanding crisis of corruption among American judges and lawyers. At question is whether the deepening despair of Americans about their own legal system, is fueling some of these violent attacks on judges.Much is written now about how America's economy is resembling that of a banana republic, given how America is sunk in preposterous debt, and how the US dollar currency is sinking toward a possible collapse in the near future.
But there is another way that America is also like a banana republic, in that its legal system - contrary to its Hollywood image - has become a sinkwell of secret proceedings, the jailing of the innocent, and political misconduct; and how it is sullied with documented corruption, fake trials and court fraud.These facts are not generally understood, because of how judicial corruption is the most un-reported news story in the American landscape. It is the category of news story which America's newspapers and media are most afraid to report, even when clear proof is in their hands.
In America right now, judges - and lawyers who are protected by judges - can commit felony crimes in broad delight, leave the proof lying around, and yet avoid being prosecuted or even having their crimes be reported by the media. The people who work in the media see a lot of material on court misconduct, and yet they know this is the story of which they dare not speak.
The lack of media coverage, in turn, encourages more judicial corruption, leaving millions of Americans in anger and despair.Confronting the secrets of US judicial corruption, is a key to understanding America's whole social crisis, and its role in the world right now. Here are some elements of this situation that you won't see in run-of-the-mill news reports:
The innocent in USA courts: imprisoned, sentenced to death, losing all they have. The key statistic to understanding America, is that it has over 2.2 million prisoners (!) out of about 300 million people. This is 25 per cent of all the prisoners, anywhere, in the entire world. By comparison, the most populous nation, China, with about 1.3 billion people, only has a few hundred thousand prisoners, despite being denounced by the USA as a "repressive" country.1 out of every 45 working-age males (that is, not counting children or the elderly) is BEHIND BARS in the United States. With working-age black males, the figures are about 1 out of 20.
This is the stuff of revolution.With so many Americans in jail right now, and many more having been to jail or on the way, the USA now has the world's biggest gulag. The United States of America is a giant machine for jailing people and making them afraid.
With 2.2 million prisoners, America can be very casual about who it throws into prison. Estimates are that at least 5 per cent, or over 100,000 of these prisoners, are completely innocent. This is well shown by the fact that over 100 of the smaller group of prisoners who have recently been on death row in America - actually sentenced to be executed - have recently been freed, innocent of the crime for which they were convicted.
As it is so easy to railroad innocent people in America on capital murder charges, which have mandatory appeals, it is even easier to railroad people on lesser criminal charges, or in malicious lawsuits where victims lose all their money and property.
With judges and lawyers making so many mistakes, sending so many innocent people to prison, and wrecking so many lives with lawsuits, the drive to cover-up for judicial mistakes becomes obsessive.
The US legal system cannot function without a cover-up. But a cover-up of judicial misconduct, becomes an invitation for corruption and bribery and more misconduct, and this vicious cycle keeps escalating.
In America's unique political landscape, the lawyers and judges have supreme power, both over themselves and over the political process. With the American theory of the "supreme" judiciary that is supposedly "independent" of politics, the recipe is there for a kind of "Praetorian Guard" mentality like in ancient Rome.
In imperial Rome, the small army of the "Praetorian Guard" theoretically protected the emperor. But as the Praetorian Guard realized its power, they were able to become a law unto themselves, controlling the empire, even dictating to the emperor, and covering up for any of their own misdeeds.
This is the role of the judges in America right now.
America needs its judges to keep order over its own far-flung empire. America's corporate rulers fear to expose the misconduct of judges, lest this empire start unraveling.Since the judges are "supreme" in America, if people realise the judges are crooked, a revolution would be at hand.US Judges as Goons for the Big CorporationsIn United States regime, most major aspects of public life are now under the control of the US-based multi-national corporations, who have effectively and openly bought and paid for everything in the American "system":
- The corporations own most US politicians, including both of the two tweedledee-tweedledum "political parties", given that both the "Democrat" and "Republican" parties, and nearly all the politicians, get their funding from the same US corporate interests, despite a little bit of pretending to be different;-
The corporations own all the major US media companies, who control what "news" most people see and read;- The corporations effectively control most of the well-known "non-profit organisations", who also depend on the large corporate or corporate-backed "donations" for their existence and income;- The corporations own the US elections, determining who is allowed by the media to be a "major candidate", and the corporations even manufacture the easily-hijackable "voting machines" that "count the votes" for people- And the corporations, above all, own the US lawyers and judges, via the corporate money and bribes that flow in the billions of dollars through US law firms, which is why they rarely lose cases among the "pro-business" US judges.
The judges enforce the "law", which in the United States means the Law of the Big Corporations. They win, the little guy (or girl) loses. That's what judges and lawyers call "The Game".
In exchange for controlling things for the benefit of the big corporations, US judges and lawyers are allowed to act like perverts with regard to the average person. They can lie, rob, cheat, steal, kill and destroy any mere average person or US citizen - that is what the judges and lawyers get, as their "reward" for running things for the benefit of the really rich people who are big shareholders in the big corporations.
America needs the myth of the "rule of law", the power of the judges, to keep control of the political situation. But the trade-off is that the judges have become a law unto themselves, and the judges and lawyers in America have built a machine that cannot be reversed by any power visible on the horizon, except some kind of revolution.US Media Control Hiding the Judges' Crimes.

The one power that the judges in America do worry about, is that of news media and publicity, either of the independent kind or from outside the United States.
Recently, the American Supreme Court judges decided in a close vote, to stop putting children to death, admitting they were influenced by world public opinion and international condemnation of this practice.
The news media in America - mostly owned by large corporations who own everything else - has a guilty conscience about all the evidence of judicial misconduct that flows regularly through their offices. The media do not report or investigate most of these stories, even when conclusive proof is plopped in their lap.
This is partly out of fear of revenge by the government and the judges, and partly out of a sense of a twisted theory of "patriotic duty". These media employees think that it is better to hide the dirty linen of the judges and courts, so as not to "upset the public" and "destabilise society". In other words, they know that the truth about the crooked US judges, is the stuff of revolution. But really, the situation is that the big media in the United States, is owned by the same big corporations who own the politicians and government, the same big corporations who pay the big law firms that bribe the judges so that the big companies almost always win their cases.
Most big corporations find themselves using American courts extensively, including the media companies. If any media company or US organisation were to independently "go after" some corrupt judges, and speak about judicial corruption, the fear is that the media company might well find itself being destroyed by the judges, as billions of dollars worth of lawsuits suddenly were "decided" against the corporation.

You may not believe this yet, but the fact is that the US judges operate like criminal gangs. They get together and pick a target, and they can decide to destroy that target if they feel it is a threat, either to themselves or to their paymasters at the big corporations.
Such terrors lurk in the back of the mind of independent and progressive journalists, perhaps even more than among the big corporate media. In America you never know whether you might find yourself arrested or sued on some trumped-up charge or accusation, if you dare to criticise the US legal system.
US journalists have been shot dead in the street, after daring to write a critical article about the judges. Just "coincidence", perhaps.Exposing a dishonest judge in America, can put you on a "black list" where no lawyer will protect you, even if you have lots of money to spend.
Experience shows, over and over again, that people in the US who try to fight judicial corruption simply cannot find lawyers for themselves, even if they have money - and even though many US lawyers are desperately unemployed and eager for money!It is still (somewhat) accepted in the US, that journalists can criticize the President and the administrative branches of government, or complain about legislators.
It is part of the function of politicians, like the President, to "take some political heat" up front, while the corporations run things behind the scenes.
However, it has become extremely taboo to say much about dishonest judges, even in the face of ice cold proof that judges are committing crimes.
You have proof of crimes by judges? Almost no journalist in the United States wants to talk with you. - That is the true reality of American life.Even though the news media in the USA are not owned by the government, they are not "independent" - far from it. The power of the judges extends to both direct and indirect control of media criticism.
Beyond the fear, there is also a feeling among USA media and lawyers and the government, that drastic and terrible calamities would occur if judicial corruption were really investigated and exposed.
As one US lawyer said, "If the American people found out how crooked the judges really are, the whole house of cards will start to crumble."People feel that faith in the courts - the Hollywood movie version of American "justice" - is what is holding the USA together.

The fear is this: If the American people start thinking that the courts are rigged, and that huge amounts of people in jail are innocent, then social chaos will be on the horizon, and America will unravel in a mass political revolution.So the US media, corrupted by corporate ownership, or afraid itself of revenge, pretends it is doing a kind of civic duty, to limit coverage of judicial corruption, to those few cases where the government itself has already decided to prosecute some wayward judge or lawyer.
Even in cases where US judges engage in absolutely blatant, open and publicly perverted misbehaviour - like the US judge who used a penis-pump on himself in his courtroom (quite true story) - the misbehaviour and crimes usually go on openly for several years, until the rogue judge finally offends some rich or politically powerful person, and the system finally slowsly takes action.America's FBI and Department of Justice collect files on judicial corruption like they collect files on everything else, but they hold back from acting, even in cases where they have clear enough evidence to bring an indictment in minutes.
The law enforcement agencies in America blow with the political winds, and in the absence of media attention, they will cover up for judges, whose help they require when they need to win convictions on flimsy evidence.
The judges who take bribes are gladly eager to help law enforcement railroad and convict innocent people. The mutual back-scratching of cops and judges is routine.
In the meantime, the anguish of millions of Americans is increasing: The 2.2 million prisoners and their families and loved ones; all those whose rights have been diminished, or their fortunes ruined; the increasing number of people forced to flee the USA to live in freedom and peace; all those living in fear in America, worried that they might be the next victim of the unfair American legal system.
The frustration of many people with American courts is building, a huge but hidden story in American life.Secrecy, gag orders, and the court files you will never seeAmerica is increasingly a closed society, with much of its legal activity carried on in secret.
And I'm not only talking about the secret detention of so many hundreds of detainees at overseas locations.
Even in America's domestic legal system, much of the important legal activity is secret and hidden.The illusion is that America is an "open" society, because there are 24 hour a day "news" channels on television, and because there are dozens of reporters and cameras outside the courthouses that are holding public-circus trials of a Martha Stewart or Michael Jackson or Paris Hilton.
But the gritty day-to-day reality of life in American courts, is that much of what really goes on, is secret, hidden, un-published, under gag order or a judge's ban on freedom of speech, or simply un-reported by the news media, even though the media knows it has something important which the American people would love to hear.
Much more than people realize, news of American court proceedings is blocked by gag orders, embargoed documents, and outright blatant and illegal bans on freedom of speech.
Though there are always some supposed higher purposes in these gag orders, a basic function of such gag orders is to hide the whole dirty process of how judges and lawyers do their work.
As judges and lawyers run the show, they are eager to use their powers to make sure that a lot of what they do is known only to themselves.
The biggest category of judicial secrecy, is the nationwide American curtain that hides complaints of misconduct about judges and lawyers.
Across the US, tens of thousands of complaints have been filed about misconduct by lawyers and judges. You can find many of them on the internet.
While some of these complaints are frivolous, and many of them are certainly emotional, a lot of these complaints are well-documented or have conclusive proof attached. But nearly all of these tens of thousands of complaints are non-published and secret, and almost nothing is done to act on these complaints, regardless of how valid or how well proven.America's secret files of judicial and lawyer misconduct, are a gold mine of information on the real dirty workings of the American legal system.
But alas, complaints about judges and lawyers are filed with - you guessed it - other judges and lawyers. These complaints are read and passed around very eagerly, as I have found by calling up judges' secretaries.
I have tracked complaints all the way up to the Supreme Court building and the Supreme Court "judicial ethics" panel that was appointed in 2004 by USA Chief Justice Rehnquist.The judges read the complaints about their fellow judges, they likely laugh and joke with each other about the people they have harmed, and perhaps quietly advise each other to behave less openly like lunatics in the future. But what the judges almost never do, is respond in any way to the complaint.
They don't answer, and they don't remedy the situation. They merely make some mental notes in case there is some publicity down the road.If there's no publicity, the judges feel they are home free.
The same goes with complaints about American lawyers to the local Bar which "regulates" lawyers, which typically just covers up for lawyer misconduct. Unless a judge is already mad at the lawyer, the local Bar will usually whitewash your complaints about a lawyer, even if you have written proof of a lawyer committing a felony crime.
People are surprised to learn that American judges often don't respond to some legal filings and complaints, and sometimes even to formal appeals. If you have expensive lawyers, and have political connections they will indeed probably answer. But otherwise, silence is common.
Poor people in America have been strapped to a table and put to death, while an appeal languished unanswered by the judges.
Fearful lawyers and fake trialsA few celebrity trials do, indeed, dominate the American news, with all sorts of tiny details gaining the headlines, like Michael Jackson said to be coming to court in his pyjamas. But hidden beyond the "detailed analysis" of the celebrity circus trials, are highly significant and heartbreaking stories of real trials, whose details you never learn.
You don't find out how someone's human rights were taken away, or how someone was railroaded on false charges, while media focuses on the latest "scoop" of some public circus legal proceeding.Americans who have not endured a court battle, have an entirely misleading sense of the legal system from two sources: (a) the celebrity circus trials and (b) fictional television shows and Hollywood movies. Yet the reality for most Americans in court, especially the poor and minorities, is something sadly different, far more sleazy and awful and sinister.
A key factor in life in America now, is the widespread moral collapse of the American legal profession.
America has about a million law school graduates, the most enormous gang of lawyers in the world. And 'gang ' is the right word.Though a core group of lawyers are wealthy, from the fees supplied by big corporations or from a few big lawsuits; many other lawyers are unemployed, desperate for work. American lawyers, as a whole, are in fear of rocking the boat or challenging the political system, lest they be cast out and put among the unemployed.US lawyers who challenge the government or try to expose corruption, will face losing their jobs, and may get cited on trumped up charges that can lead to the loss of their ability to practice law, financial destruction, or even criminal indictments.
The net result is that there are only a small handful of American lawyers now, who are willing to (very slightly) politically challenge the American government. But if you ask about lawyers who are willing to challenge corruption by other lawyers and judges, that handful of lawyers dwindles to almost complete zero.
Even unemployed and broke lawyers are afraid to confront judicial corruption for a paying client. The lawyers will privately explain it is "career suicide", and just too plain "dangerous", to try to confront dishonest judges and other lawyers.
The US human rights and civil liberties groups stay away from this area, too. - They don't want to lose their corporate funding, or suffer financial destruction at the hands of America's criminally vengeful judges in some bogus "lawsuit".The betrayal of clients by lawyers in the USA, is terrifyingly common.
An example is the army of "public defenders" that "represent" poor people as they get convicted and sent to prison. Some of these public defenders are brave and good people, at heart.But many of them are lazy and incompetent, like the lawyers known to be falling asleep and snoozing in court while their assigned clients are convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
These "public defender" lawyers are often paid out of government money. If they do not help the government. Even worse, however, are the all-too-common public defenders who actually help the government to stage fake trials against their own clients. these lawyers can be dropped from the register, lose their income, and be replaced by other lawyers more willing to be submissive.
Though such lawyers may pretend to be "helping" their clients, they often take another role, terrifying and intimidating their clients into accepting unfair plea bargains and prison terms, even when the clients are innocent.
Sometimes the "public defenders" really deserve to be imprisoned themselves. I am currently working on helping an innocent French citizen, Leonel Cazaco, who was sentenced to life in prison for a murder, even though someone else confessed to the crime.
At his trial, Mr Cazaco's "public defenders" knew that someone else had already confessed to the murder, but they hid these facts from the court record and from Mr Cazaco himself, to help the government win the conviction.
The French government has become active for Mr Cazaco, and his release is hoped for in the future.But US lawyers are often eager to betray and steal from clients, even when the clients are paying them. Lawyers will sell out and manipulate their clients, to benefit either the government, or the wealthier party that is paying them bribes.
This is something lawyers call "playing The Game".Actually, even very rich political people get robbed by their own lawyers, the lawyers pushing the wealthy people into needless legal cases, just so the lawyers can "milk" them for money. As long as some of the stolen money makes its way into the hands of the judges, even the rich victims usually cannot get redress against the lawyers who have robbed and defrauded them.
Some of America's rogue judges, intoxicated with their sense of unlimited and unrestrained power, get quite cocky about committing felony crimes in broad daylight, leaving a trail of written evidence and even posting it on the internet. It is remarkable what offences they can commit and still remain in office, unchallenged by either news media or law enforcement.
The fake US federal legal proceeding, that forced me to become a political refugee in Europe back in 2004, is one such set of open felony crimes. It is a well-known story now, with a US federal judge instantly banning my freedom of speech and then threatening to jail and murder me, while conducting a fake legal proceeding with the judge's friends posing both as my lawyers, and also as lawyers for a non-existent "first amendment civil rights charity foundation".The judge and his friends issued fake "court orders" claiming I "agreed" to the banning of my own freedom of speech for the rest of my life, "agreed" to the destruction of my media and publishing company, "agreed" to work for the rest of my life paying several hundred thousand dollars to the friends of the federal judge with the fake "Foundation", and "agreed" never to appeal all these illegal orders or the fraud of the fake "legal proceeding".- You can find more details at the website about me, and the central legal presentation in my 125-count 3 April 2004 US Appeals Court filing exposing the crimes of the US federal judges. - Needless to say, the US judges never answered my court filing - My court filing was too crisp and precise, too well-supported by proof documents, about the crimes the US federal judges had committed, so the US judges don't dare to reply.
Before the US government gangsters moved in to jail and murder me, and I was forced to escape to Europe to save my life, I did everything I could to find a US lawyer to help me. Specifically so I could find a lawyer, in my final months in the US, I got myself hired into a $150,000 per year job, just so I could afford good lawyers.I had thought, with so much written proof in my hands of judicial corruption, I would be able to find some brave lawyer to expose all these blatant crimes.
I thought I would win back my freedom and strike a blow for justice, just like in some Hollywood movie.I contacted thousands of lawyers, but no lawyer was willing to help me, even though I could pay them well. The lawyers agreed that I had total proof of judicial corruption and felony crime, and they lusted after my money.But, as the US lawyers explained to me, there is no way to "fight a crooked judge that's backed by the Bush government".
The lawyers were too frightened for their own safety, to risk trying to defend me against a malicious federal judge and his friends. Meanwhile, the judge's friends began to close in on me, demanding extortion money and ready to carry out their threats to jail and murder me.
Thankfully, I escaped from America, the fake and phoney "land of freedom", and that's why you can read these words right now, written in my safe haven in Europe. And then, in 2007, more than three years after I took refuge in Europe, the US judges conducted a new fake "legal proceeding" just for the purpose of creating false media to slander me, and to try and ban my popular writings on US legal corruption, like this article you are reading now, banned by US judges who have served legal papers on Google.
One of the most moving documents I collected in the USA, was a heartfelt note from a gravely ill former Virginia judge, in danger of dying. She wrote to me to confess that Virginia judges, both state and federal, were utterly sunk in crime and bribery, and she correctly predicted that no lawyer would have the courage to help me, despite my proof of judicial corruption.
She herself was scared to help me, thinking that the stress would kill her if she got up from her sickbed to try and fight for me.With these recent deplorable acts of murderous violence against judges and their families, I can see that the instinct of American judges will be to deepen the cover up of judicial misconduct, as if quashing the news and truth about themselves will make them safer. Hence the new 2007 US fake trial to try and ban my freedom of speech all over again, more than three years after I took refuge in Europe.A better course would be to move toward a more transparent judicial process, with complaints out in the public and posted on the internet, and with the public impeachment and prosecution of the more notorious rogue judges. Americans today need some hope that there is justice at the end of the struggle, and not just a stone wall of corruption and despair.But that is not happening, as the corporate forces of the US regime unite to attack any significant movement at judicial reform, and most especially the laudably-named JAIL 4 Judges. - The United States needs a return to real democracy and the values of the Bill of Rights, but it seems that in the face of judicial corruption, it is only a major revolution that can end these crimes of horror in which Americans now find themselves.