I contended that serious crimes have been committed, In Fairfax County Courts and that the evidence backing my claims of judge shopping, false swearing, fabrication of “evidence,” perjured testimony (over and again), subornation of perjury and cover-up thereof is ironclad and well-documented.
The only thing that was not clear was whether anyone in the Virginia Legislature or otherwise in authority will have the nerve to pursue a matter in which Fairfax County judges, prosecuting attorney(s) and a police officer are the ones being accused of committing felonies.
AFFIDAVIT OF ELIZABETH J. PAWLAK
OPPOSING CERTIFICATION FOR RE-APPOINTMENT
OF JUDGES MICHAEL J. CASSIDY AND DENNIS SMITH (FAIRFAX COUNTY)
Read the whole affidavit here.
3. In a justice system that heavily relies on the integrity of police, prosecutors and judges, the re-appointment of Judges Michael J. Cassidy and Dennis Smith (Fairfax County) who
colluded (or conspired) with the Commonwealth’s Attorney’s Office for Fairfax County to cover up serious crimes on the part of the Fairfax County police officer and the Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney will send a terrifying message that official lawlessness may be above the law.
Accordingly, I request that the certifications of Judges Michael J. Cassidy and Dennis Smith be
temporarily withheld pending more complete investigation.
4. On December 10, 2010, I testified about two inextricably-intertwined proceedings:
one before Judge Cassidy of the General District Court(Cases Nos. GT08258169-00 and
GT08258170-00 ), and one before a series of judges of the Fairfax County Circuit Court (Cases
Nos. MI 2009-321 and MI 2009-322). I contended that serious crimes have been committed, and
that the evidence backing my claims of judge shopping, false swearing, fabrication of “evidence,”
perjured testimony (over and again), subornation of perjury and cover-up thereof is ironclad and
well-documented. The only thing that was not clear was whether anyone in the Virginia Legislature
or otherwise in authority will have the nerve to pursue a matter in which Fairfax County judges,
prosecuting attorney(s) and a police officer are the ones being accused of committing felonies. The
individuals in question have engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious
administration of the business of the court by manipulating established court procedures so as to
accomplish their personally desired result(s). Moreover, a criminal justice system in which the
prosecutor alone is able to select the judge of his choice to preside at trial so that this judge will be
his agent or henchman (as it is the case here) raises serious concerns about the appearance of
partiality and serious questions about the confidence in the judicial integrity of our courts and the
obvious prejudice that such actions have on the public confidence in the judiciary.
5. My claims of judge shopping, false swearing, fabrication of “evidence,” perjured
testimony (over and again), subornation of perjury and cover-up were reduced by Delegates Janis,
Athey and Gilbert to discretionary rulings regarding “facts” and “no judge shopping” in order to
deflect the attention from the true issues that have nothing to do with either any “facts” or unfettered judicial discretion. While a court has jurisdiction and discretion to err and the remedy to correct an error by a trial court is to appeal the court's decision upon entry of a final order, no trial court has jurisdiction to render the order based on an invalid indictment (or warrant or summons) -such orders
1. I am over the age of eighteen and am competent to testify in the matter herein.
2. My name is Elizabeth J. Pawlak. I received my legal education at Georgetown
University Law Center (JD ’92). I practice patent law before the United States Patent and Trademark Office. My additional educational and professional credentials are recited at
Dr. Elizabeth J. Pawlak, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that:
