No Judge who is corrupt, who condones corruption in others, can possibly remains on the Bench.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Judge Leslie Alden Invents Non-existent Rules

Judge Leslie Alden allowed deceiving man to demonstrate forged Documents, under Oath.........

Judge Leslie Alden knowingly allowed perjured testimony in her court room.....

I have seen her invent non-existent rules and conditions concerning quantum merit (a type of contract case)…………..

It was clear to me that she really did not care all that much about what the law says, but was more interested in her own opinions of what the law should say. That is, she paid no respect to the precedents, but just made up "Alden's Law" to suit her own fancy.
The fake Driver’s License had the Holliday Inn Hotel address in Washington DC with the room number!!!!!!!! The forged Drivers license was too evident, like printing $3.00 bill and try to shop with it.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Iniquitous Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County

Iniquitous Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County

By: Karen Ann DeLuca

many women in Fairfax, myself included, somewhat broken and beaten down, can testify to feeling crushed in a tantamount manner, financially and spiritually, by judges who'd rather make quota than focus on doing their best in deciding a case.

Instead of reducing library hours and cutting school funding to save money, perhaps the judicial budget should be explored for savings and salaries reduced or tied into performance as rated by the taxpayers until the purpose of the courthouse is restored.

After trying for over a year, I finally, and quite unexpectedly, was granted an Order to Show Cause by the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court in Fairfax County against my ex husband for contempt. The issues involved would sound familiar to any divorced woman - tardy (or non-payment of) alimony (or child support), failure (twice) to keep current home or work information as required by the Final Decree, and in my case, a failure to sell the marital residence within 120 days of that document. The hearing was set for May 21st; I dutifully prepared and filed a Memorandum in support of my position.
On the appointed day, I drew Judge Bruce D. White. He was running late from the 10AM (law) docket session; by the time our case, scheduled for 11:30AM, and his last one for the day, was called, it was 1PM. I was given 15 minutes to present my fairly complicated argument, which contained infractions spanning over six years, and examine two witnesses. - (Fred Rejali) An impossible task. And needless to say, the Judge's decision was that I had not proven my case. Duh! How could I? I had barely scratched the surface when he called "time up!"
Leaving out the details of my ex's long pauses in "answering" my questions as a tactic in stalling and taking up time, or his attorney's resorting to, as his primary tactic, an attempt to soil my good name to "balance" things out, because, well, that's all he had, as I was sitting in the courtroom all I could think of was why was something as important as the issue of late (or non-payment) of alimony (or child support), relegated to so little judicial concern and attention?
There is something very wrong with a system that does not honor the provisions of its own orders, by way of allowing a litigant - and in most instances, still, a female one - to fully present a case for contravention and consequential damages. It begs the question, what good are judicial dictates, if, when someone does not abide by them, a complainant is held to such an impossible and nebulous standard that the resultant message from a judge is "who cares?" As a follow up corollary, then, just what good are courts?
Fifteen minutes is not enough time to prove a case that is far from simple. But what I found even more baffling is that during my hearing, not once did Judge White admonish my ex for his flagrant, longstanding and extensive violations of the Final Decree. I would like to think that this is not a "men stick together" thing, but the absence of a scolding, on a contempt Order issued by the Chief Judge, was glaring and disappointing.
The better course on issues such as violations severe enough to merit a Rule to Show Cause would be to routinely schedule the matter on a day other than Friday Motion Day, allow at least an hour, and let each side to present all their evidence before making a decision, which might even be taken under advisement. Otherwise, why bother issuing the Order to Show Cause in the first place, except to go through the motions, no pun intended, and cruelly leave the injured party in no better position than before. It would also be helpful if the judge came prepared and was familiar with the file; in my case, the silence in response to my query as to whether my Memorandum had been read spoke volumes.
A decision is only as good as the system that generates it. Some of that has to do with personnel; most of it with institutional procedures. It all equals bad judging, and from my perspective, it appears that women, particularly those that cannot afford high priced representation, those that need the court's assistance the most, are more often than not on the receiving end of its shafting.
Instead of reducing library hours and cutting school funding to save money, perhaps the judicial budget should be explored for savings and salaries reduced or tied into performance as rated by the taxpayers until the purpose of the courthouse is restored. The legal concerns of citizens paying the tab deserve quality handling, not the bum rush herding treatment that so many of us are familiar with in another broken system - health care. How both law and medicine are practiced impact people's lives. And while premature physical infirmities and death are a more obvious byproduct of a sick mode of operation, many women in Fairfax, myself included, somewhat broken and beaten down, can testify to feeling crushed in a tantamount manner, financially and spiritually, by judges who'd rather make quota than focus on doing their best in deciding a case.

Prejudiced Judge Teena Grodner


Prejudiced Judge Teena Grodner
The Bias Judge Teena D. Grodner feels as though she is making me pay for......... talking to a White Social Worker the way that I had spoken to her on March 15th of 2000. In all fairness the way I express myself is being up front and very blunt, especially if it concerns my only child.Read more:
In the middle of a nightmare…the Judge that ripped my only child away from me. Never thinking to have anymore children because I was mourning the loss of my first. This has been one of my most difficult challenges to prove the injustice that has been impeded upon me by, 1) The Four Police Officers 2) The Social Worker 3) The Judge; In Fairfax County Virginia. Part three.
Fred Rejali & Judge Teena Grodner.
As part three begins, I want my readers to feel all that I’ve been through. Believe me when I say,” This isn’t a matter of pulling the race card, it’s truly about revealing how our justice system allows BIAS authority figures to use their Power Of Authority to render down harsh and unusual punishment.” I cannot sit no longer while all those that was related to my case continue to be promoted for their Inaccurate Investigations, Fabricated testimonies, Kangaroo Court Room, Inappropriate Behavior, and Labeling me a racist.Read more:

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Teaching the Courts Their Alphabet

Teaching the Courts Their Alphabet
By: Karen DeLuca.Alexandria, Virginia

Editor, Times-Dispatch:

While campaigning, Bob McDonnell's "one new idea" was divestiture of the state liquor stores. Now, schools, social services, public safety, and state employee pensions are on the commonwealth's GPS. Virginia is for S's. Why not shift gears? Backpedal closer to the top of the alphabet, rather than fuel taxes and gun sales, and privatize the courts. Portions of their functions already are privatized -- for example, through the increased use of mediation. In many instances, a judge's signature is just a rubber-stamp of an out-of-court compromise or one party's position. With more legal issues being resolved the DIY way, there is less need for the traditional role of the judiciary, or for the pricey courthouses that garage them.
Or they could become self-funded, or the "public option" in a hybrid system, forced to upgrade the quality of their product to maintain traffic on the theory no one will pay for a lousy, accelerated job. This would mean parking the best, most experienced personnel in the lower courts, where decision-making is typically determinative. If litigants are satisfied below, such positioning could eliminate the need for some of the vast appellate bureaucracy -- more potential budget savings. Because here's the clunker we have now: There's the "avoidance canon," where judges either don't decide or rule on a ground which really doesn't resolve anything, but disposes of a matter to get it off their desk. Expensive and inconclusive for litigants who expect and deserve more than a drive on the road to nowhere.
Another major problem, at all levels, is law-clerk justice. Just out of school, a bunch of mostly 25-year-olds in training, making impactful decisions that their bosses blindly sign off on. As these rulings travel up the system, they are routinely rubber-stamped by more apprentices, who cover their peers' tracks in this self-interest network where everyone's paving the way for their next career move. A stop sign should be put to this extra-constitutional exercise of judicial power and payment of redundant salaries.
In a Virginia running on fumes, officials need to look past their blind spots to non-retread solutions. That includes the commonwealth's side street and back alley courts. It's as easy as A, B, See . . .
Karen DeLuca.


My Judge was convicted of fraud and ....

"My Judge was convicted of fraud and still managed to ignore the law, deny me legal representation, and send my children to live with their abusive dad.

I had sole custody of the children (ages 13 & 16) since birth, they were both on honor roll and living well. The law was clearly ignored, despite the mountain of evidence presented at trial. I was given total decision making over education and therapeutic needs - basically, am required to babysit the dad and report back to court each time that he harasses the school -- so that I can be harassed again. Weekend visitation only. How do you start the process. So far my written complaints have been ignored. "

by: Carmen Coleman

One corrupt evil judge down and 100's to go

"One corrupt evil judge down, & 100's to go...

The judge who gave my ex husband custody of my two kids was later found to be on heroine & other illegal drugs, & used it quite regularly while doing his job.

He slept through most of the trial the day I lost my kids in 1998. (signs of heroine use) I got a recording of this trial because I wanted to prove that he slept through it, unfortunately the courts conveniantly cut out the part of him snoozing in the court video. And I didn't get 5 & a half hours of trial recording either, I think I was lucky to get 1 hour of the recording after they were done editing it.

There were reports that Judge Ray Harding Jr. was very abusive to his wife & children. He was sent to prison, for idk how long. But I was never able to get a retrial, no attorney I hired, dared to do it. And to this day, the 4th district court in Provo, Utah has nothing bad to say about Judge Ray Harding Jr. The heroine addict....> > I feel these Judges NEED to be held accountable for the decisions they make that destroy ppl's lives... It makes me sick to see the consequences of the rulings they make, after blatently ignoring evidence of abuse or threats made. Their decisions have effected too many children to count. Makes me wonder how they would feel if they got letters from some of these poor kids after they age out of the system, telling them how they destroyed their lives?... Maybe a class action law suit should be filed against all of them!> > Thank God this judge lemkau, will no longer beable to hurt or effect another child with his biased decisions.... Too bad an innocent life had to be lost to have him removed though.... I saw the mother of this child on the Dr. Phil show, I just wept when I heard her story. This never should have happened...."

We have suffered at the hands of Fairfax County Judges in the Family Court system

We have suffered at the hands of Fairfax County Judges in the Family Court system in 2006,and again in 2009.Hoe effective have you been in getting any action against this biasised and corrupt system?

Debra Woodward

Children took hostage by Corrupted Virginia Judicial System

Children took hostage by Corrupted Virginia Judicial System.

Scott D. Landry Esq. was appointed Guardian ad Litem

Good Afternoon,

My name is Lisa Parenti and I live in Midlothian, VA. My daughters were taken away from me on July 23, 2009. at the time my oldest daughter just turned 5 and my youngest was 10 months old.

I started dating my husband in September of 2001. The relationship was very rocky, but in July 2003 I found out I was pregnant with my first child. After I told him I was pregnant he packed up and moved to West Virginia with his dad. In October 2003, he contacted me and stated that he wanted to work things out and he wanted me to move to West Virginia, so I did in hopes that we could work things out and my child wold have a family. In March 2004 my daughter was born, in August 2004 we moved back to Virginia. The very next day he left us. He did not pay child support nor did he return until she was 2 years old. At that time he once again wanted to work things out and I went back to him and a month later we got married. in May 2007 i noticed a change in his behavior, he became increasingly verbally abusive, threatning, volitile and distructive. Often trowing furniture at me, calling me a "worthless piece of shit", and telling me " Do you have any idea how much easier my life would be if you were dead" He also started drinking heavily. In April 2008, I discovered that he was having an affair with our daughter's friends mother. After I found out his drinking and his behavior became even worse. On June 1, 2008, 6 months pregnant with my second child (whom he openly denied was his until she was 3 months old), I took my daughter and left him and went back to live with my parents. In August 2008 I deneid him visitation due to him constantly threatning me over the phone that he was gonna kill me. In September 2008 shortly before the birth of my second child I filed divorce papers. Scott D. Landry Esq. was appointed Guardian ad Litem in my case and, after lengthy trials and litigation from September 2008 through July 2008 of he and his mother stating that I abuse and neglect my children, which couldn't be further from the truth, and making him out to be the victim. he was awarded full physical custody of my children.

I see my girls once a week on Wednsdays from 6pm until 9am and every other weekend from Friday at 6pm until Monday at 9am. I am not allowed to be apart of my oldests education, or do any extra activities with my children. And 95% of my monthly salary goes to him for child support. He doesnt work and has a full time nanny at the house to take care of the children.

I am completley heartbroken. I went from being their primary caregiver (he did absolutley nothing for them or with them) to only having a limited amout of time with them while a nanny raises them.

This is a very long story and there is alot more detail, please feel free to contact me by email, or phone ........ Any information I can receive to help get my girls home will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Lisa Parenti

Thursday, June 10, 2010

CFSA of DC Criminal, Corruption and Cover up

we have come across the little known fact that James P. Toscano, Esq., the General Counsel (top lawyers) for DC Child Protective Services (CFSA) has an arrest record in Arlington, Virginia for indecent exposure (masturbating in a urinal in a public bathroom (frequented by children) while looking into a bathroom stall) at a shopping Mall.

When a Child Protection Executive Employee is a sex offender, likelywith minors involved, should they remain in the public's trust and continue to work, especially when they use their influence to help suspected abusers to not be detected and accountable?

This arrest occurred 2004 when Mr. Toscano was an attorney recently transferred to Child Protective Services (CFSA) from the DC Attorney General’s office.

He was charged, and through his attorney who specializes in "park arrests" with sexual activity made a deal with the Arlington County Prosecutor that the charges would be dropped after he finishes a year of supervised probation and complete a sex offender evaluation.

After the one year probation, in 2005, the charges were dropped just before his scheduled trial.

Despite this arrest and the nature of the charges, Mr. James Toscano who works alongside the Director, Dr. Roque Gerald as an Executive who sets policy for all, and an employee arrest policy that states automatic termination, he is allowed to continue working at DC Child Protection Agency (CFSA) on children’s abuse cases. In addition, he was promoted in 2008 to the General Counsel of CFSA.

A 2007 memo of the then CFSA General Counsel stated that a Probation before Judgement (PBJ) for indecent exposure is grounds for termination — but Mr. Toscano was not terminated. As explained in the letter to Mr. Wells and Dr Gerald, Mr. Toscano has helped the suspected abuser by personally interfering and providing false information in at least one case helping to cause the investigation to be improperly done. Mr. Toscano actively worked to help the alleged abuser/neglectful parent and appeared to act beholden to the abuser’s attorney (who is from an old Arlington family and knows his way around its courthouse very well — and no doubt knew about Mr. Toscano’s background). In 2009 and 2010, Roy Morris, Esq. testified before the DC City Council Chair, Tommy Wells Committee regarding this matter twice, and in neither instance was there any followup or expression of concern from any DC officials.

They act as if they know all of this already, and are intent on doing nothing about it.The problem here is too obvious, based on the documentation attached.
James Toscano and Child Protective Services are intent to hide the truth from the public.