No Judge who is corrupt, who condones corruption in others, can possibly remains on the Bench.

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Children who witness abuse.....

Then, Children are forced into the abusive & neglectful hands of Immoral parent...........
Full story here.....
When children witness domestic violence, they start to believe it is acceptable. The Department of Justice has stated they don’t even have to witness it…they just have to be in the same household to be considered as witnessing. When an abuser gets custody of children from their victim, the children get validation, thanks to family court and the associated corrupt bastards, that it is acceptable to beat a parent, then take the children to live with the perpetrator. So this study is no surprise given the sad shape of family courts worldwide, and the bias against mothers.

What is shocking is the large numbers of children who believe hitting a woman is justified. Ugggh! From the BBC:

Monday, August 16, 2010

Where is Deborah S. Olin? What is going to happen to the Children who were Demolished by her Hideous actions?

Where is Deborah S. Olin? What is going to happen to the Children who were Demolished by her Hideous actions?
Oh my God….We are ambushed in Olin’s depraved Scheme.........
There is no hope of receiving a fair ruling or get out of Olin’s trap………..
Ms Olin counterfeited court orders which are not matching the Court Report.....She Basically unlawfully Structures & makes up Court orders.The most dangerous Guardian Ad Litem in Fairfax, Arlington County
Deborah S Olin
After receiving so many complaints in regards of Deborah S Olin's terrifying actions, & concerning the way this GAL who frequently appointed by Judges in Arlington & Fairfax county courts handeling little innocent children's cases, We decided to publish this issue in Mommy go bye bye few months ago, since then we have established so many chilling stories.By researching & Comparing Olin’s cases we found it so appalling that she practices almost a uniformed strategy in order to damage Children and their Mom’s lives. Her Most popular tactic is “Judge Shopping” in order to set you up in the Court & get what she wants through her fellow Influenced Judges. Olin’s Case #1:The child who lived to tell the tale of sick minded GAL – Deborah S Olin turned 18 years old and ready to expose the real depraved GAL who put this child in torment & agony for more than 5 years………….Ms. Olin decided to place her in different foster homes, while the loving fit parents were endlessly fighting to bring her back home and at the same time the child was begging her (Olin) to do so, as a result of her actions, The minor child attempted suicide 4 times, Ran away from different Foster homes to find her way back to her loving real parents, turned into drugs,………& so much more….when you see the evidences & facts on this case, it makes you sick into your stomach, nevertheless makes you wonder, how this malicious woman got appointed on such a important position by Virginia Judges………. ?Deborah Olin was switching Judges within minutes. We were scheduled to be in the X Judge’s Court Room, but always end up before her fellow Judge who was unfairly influenced by Olin……. So, we knew, no matter how strong our evidences are, there is no way of getting a fair verdict. Oh my God….We are ambushed in Olin’s depraved Scheme, said………………….. Mother begged to have her daughter in the separate home, while the father trying to clear the accusations against him, Olin objected………..Mother saw her daughter in the court after a long time of separation, both wanted to hug each other.Olin: “You only have 1 Minute to hold your daughter” while closely checking on them……"one minute is up," she said while separating the Mother who had no accusations against her from her loving daughter…….This is outrages.Detailed & comprehensive of this story to be published soon.
Olin's Case # 2:Deborah S. Olin proceedings & her atrocious actions In regards of Dr. Ariel King & her 5 year old daughter (Ariana-Leilani now 6) who Olin managed to unfairly take her away from the loving Mother.Mother has not seen her daughter for over one year now.Dr. Ariel King (Mother) is actively demanding her daughter’s (Ariana-Leilani now 6) rights to be acknowledged through UN Committee on the Rights of the Child and various other local & international organizations.Motion for sanctions against the Guardian Ad Litem & Motion to dismiss the Guardian Ad Litem (Deborah Olin) & Motion to show Cause against D. Olin - here
Olin's Case # 3:In regards of delivering Minor Children's passports to the convicted Document-fraud- addicted /Criminal Father.Tragedy Started when“Deborah S Olin” was appointed as the GAL........ on this case.The 2 little girls are in the serious menace at this point, all because of this woman.The convicted criminal Father who only had Supervised visitation due to his criminal acts, acquired not only unsupervised visitation, but granted with the children’s passports…….with the help of eminent Judge shopper, anti Children/ Mothers rights Guardian Ad-Litem Deborah S Olin.
Ms Olin managed the counterfeited court order which is not matching the Court Report.
The magistrate office issued arrest warrant against the Father for electronic harassments, due to the Threatening emails he was sending to Mother (on most Olin was included)On the Father’s criminal Court dates, Ms. Olin (Guardian Ad-Litem for the Children?) was there for the Father !!!!Olin keeps Intimidating the Mother and running around to find one of her fellow Judges in order to dismiss and drop the charges against the Father…………..how bizarre is that? Why we always end up with Olin’s unjust fellow Judges? We were scheduled to be heard in Judge…. Court Room, how did we end up in Olin’s prejudiced Judge again & again & again???????????? There is no hope of receiving a fair ruling or get out of Olin’s trap………..Said……. (Sound fimiliar with Case #1 above?) This case is outrages, but, it’s well documented. More to come on this case...... We are actively communicating with different organizations, in order to get to the bottom of this corruption…………………
Dear Ms. Lelia Hopper
Director Court Improvement ProgramOffice of the Executive SecretarySupreme Court of VirginiaRichmond, Virginia
(804) 786-9546
Dear Ms. Lelia Hopper;I’ve received this article, and sending you ……………………This is in regards of GAL Deborah S Olin I would say one of the worst GALs in the Fairfax County and Arlington Courts.So far, I am aware of #s outrages cases that D. Olin has totally damaged the children and Mom’s lives.These Moms abused by the GAL Deborah Olin believe that the system failed their children and the family.She has no mercy for the little kids and definitely hates their Moms…………..they say, even though ……………………Dear Mr. Dave Albo;Chairman of Virginia House of DelegatesI start writing you the story of my excruciating experience in the desecrated Fairfax County courts “Both JD&R & Circuit” for the past 7 years and you be the Judge of all Judges please…………..the nightmare started when Deborah S. Olin was assigned on our case, She is..........
Comments:

James Martinez (not verified)
at 16:11 on September 9th, 2009
Its sad to hear that this woman is not the only one I am having problems with another Guardian Ad Litem Named Nancy Alsfeder , who works on cases coming out of fairfax county who is not doing her job and trying to do her best to see that my daughter goes into the system. I am a fit father who resides in california and has been traveling back and forth .This Nancy lady has nothing to put against me but the fact that I have lived a great satisfying life in a different state ...My daughters mother who has been allegated with abuse and neglect against my daughter and who is facing assult and battery againt her own motherand also has drug dependency problems, is still being given a better oppurtunity than I have they are still some what considering my daughter be put there with her..But ultimately placing her in foster care there is no reason for my daughter to be awarded to the state when she has a father who can provide and nurture her..It sad that this county is getting away with destroying familys Please if there is anyone who is interested in hearing my case or have some advice on what i can do please contact me.


Dawn Davis (not verified)
at 15:45 on September 29th, 2009
I am learning that my story is all too familiar. My divorce case was heard in Suffolk, Virginia (3 hours southwest of Fairfax). I have lived in Northern VA for a little over two years now, since my ex-husband threw me and our 20 month old son at the time out of our home. He pulled a knife on me and locked himself in the bathroom. He kept yelling that he wished he was dead and wished he had a gun. When I tried to leave with our son in my arms, he swung open the door and tried to pull our son from my arms into the bathroom with the knife. During the first hearing two years ago, I was awarded full custody and he got supervised visitation. He was also ordered to go to a psychiatrist for an evaluation, which he turned out to be diagnosed with Major Depression and Adjustment Disorder. A Guardian ad Litem, T. Kirk Pretlow was assigned to the case at the request of my husband's attorney. My attorney objected, requesting the judge appoint his own, but the judge turned the request down. From that point on and for two years, the GAL was a nightmare for me. He never called me, interviewed me. or even called my son's daycare and doctor for interviews. He kept threatening me to "talk" to my husband or it would result in me losing custody. I replied to him (through email) that I had no problems talking to my husband, but only about our son. My husband wanted to talk to me everyday, and cried to the GAL whenever I didn't citing that I was not communicating. To make matters worse, my husband assaulted my mom during a visitation drop off and was convicted in August 2008. THe GAL told me that it was my fault for the assault, even though I wasn't even there. He always blamed me for my husband's outbursts. I reported the GAL to the Virginia Sate Board in November 2008 and wrote a letter to the judge. By rule, they notify the attorney when a complaint is filed. I was hoping this would get him to remove himself from the case, make the judge remove him or at least make him do his job, but it did not. He said that my son should stay with me, but during the final trial on August 31, 2009, he stood up and saif that he "changed his mind." He said that I needed to "mellow out" and I needed to have my son taken away from me to teach me a lesson and make me talk to my husband. The judge had said earlier in the case that he would wait for the GAL's opinion before making a ruling on custody. The parenting evaluator also changed his mind. His first report recommended that I keep physical custody, with my son not spending more than a week from me. Well, in February 2009, he was paid double by my husband to conduct a new evaluation and had already conducted a home visit before even calling me to tell me. His name is Dr. Brain K. Wald. In court, he admitted to being paid $6000 by my husband and $1000 for his appearance. He even lied about when he spoke to me. I lost physical custody of my son to a man with mental illness and an arrest record. I would ask myself how o why this happened, but I know how, and only the good Lord knows why. I believe that this is a temporary situation to allow me to reach out to others and share my story. Shedding light on our judicial system is the only way there wil ltruly be justice. THere are so many corrupt attorneys and judges out there, that to try a remove them all on your own would take forever. But to bring the stories together and shed the light on the bigger issue; children being displaced and losing precious years for no resason. If you want to share you story, you have a pair of ears ready to listen. I plan to write an editorial to publish of the many stories out there that are all too familiar and devasting.

Corrupt Custody Evaluator Janelle Burrill is going to be in handcuffs soon...



Custody Mediator Picketed
Parents who have lost custody of their children picketed the office of the woman they say committed child abuse, extortion and fraud.
By KFBK's Bob Moffitt
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Listen to the report Three parents have filed complaints with the Sacramento Police Department against Doctor Janelle Burrill who is a court-appointed mediator in custody disputes in divorce cases. Among those on the losing end is Jayraj Nair. He says his son was taken away in handcuffs a year and a half ago and that he and his entire family have been barred from seeing his son since. He says Doctor Burrill diagnosed Suraj as suffering from Parental Alienation Syndrome after the boy did not want to visit with his mother. Burrill's attorney and husband, John O'Donnell would not comment. In March, her Board Certified Diplomate Certification was revoked by the American Board of Examiners.
I truly hope the system can come crumbling down and we can pull our children from the wreckage.
Virginian Mothers who have been injured by :
Keep in mind that these two Defective & dangerous VA Court appointed Child Custody GAL & child evaluator, Should be going in handcuffs along with Janelle Burrill. Lets take action and bring them to Justice.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

punishing a mother for speaking to News Channel after The FATHER raped his child and is now...........



"When a protective mother who is not trained in the law…tries to get criminal charges filed against a child abuser and speaks out when the system failsher child, she is prosecuted."We have seen repeated examples" he says, where officials "have neglected their duty to aggressively and competently investigate child abuse cases and take offenders off the street."
She said that the Children’s Assessment Center, a Houston-run facility that specializes in assessing children who may have been abused, confirmed that her daughter had been molested and sexually assaulted by her husband. On top of it, her husband had voluntarily confessed to police that he had, indeed, molested children.
But weeks had since passed and her now-estranged husband had still not been arrested.
In a television interview with the 11 News Defenders, the mother described how the police officer handling her case had repeatedly promised an arrest on a particular date. But she claimed that date would come and go with no arrest.
Frustrated, she said she called the officer and was told that it wasn’t unusual in "these types of cases" for an arrest not to occur until nine weeks had passed.
Eventually, the mother decided to tape her next conversation with that officer, which was later broadcast on KHOU.
In the taped exchange, he explained the delay:
" I’ve got 100 of these that I’m actually working on literally...and there’s no way you can work ‘em with any kind of consistency and keep up."

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Criminal action against Corrupt Judge and Custody Evaluator



Make sure to make a CNN ireport about it, she’ll like that.





Another lazy, biased, corrupt judge lets an abuser have visitation with young son he is abusing, and threatens to take custody from the mother if she complains anymore about it. Judges that do this deserve the death penalty.
Fire them, send them to court and convict them, and sentence them to death. That is what they do to these children when they tell mothers they are lying, and order the children to go with the abusive father.
Here is the portion of the article where the judge threatens the mother. Grrrrrrrrrr:


“Your honor, I fear for my son, he came back with all the bruising,” Gallegos said, according to court transcripts, not finishing her sentence.


“I already made my order OK?” Pacheco said. “I talked to the detective; the detective talked to the doctor. I’ve done my investigation, I feel very confident this man did not hurt his son all right? …“I think you’re overreacting all right? Now, if you continue to act this way… I’ll have to take custody away from you and… I will give custody to the person (Murderer of your little Son) that is most willing to cooperate with the other parent, and giving them custody OK?” Pacheco said, according to court transcripts.


“I understand you want to protect your child, and that’s fine. That’s the way moms are, and dads too. But I don’t see anything here to stop him from letting him see his son OK?


I really don’t.”


Pacheco ordered the mother to continue allowing overnight weekend visits between the toddler and his father and threatened to take away custody if she made additional allegations against the father.




Wednesday, August 4, 2010

Dishonored and influenced Judges in Fairfax County Virginia


Judge Bruce D. White
How do you feel if you have to leave your little grand child unsupervised, in the hands of a Convicted Criminal, who has no Identity but a chain of criminal activities, who just happened to be the Father ?
Let alone giving him the child's Passport.If they don’t come back home, how do you report a missing person to the police? If you don’t know where he lives, or work, what name he is using today? If he always caries loads of cash money to conduct his unlawful business & using his little kids to enhance his ugly Business.
Do you still justify your ruling on this case as
“Best Interest of the


How about Judge Leslie Alden who allowed deceiving man to demonstrate forged Documents, in her court room....under Oath......... ????????
Judge Leslie Alden knowingly allowed perjured testimony in her court room..... I have seen her invent non-existent rules and conditions concerning quantum merit (a type of contract case)………….. It was clear to me that she really did not ...

Saturday, July 31, 2010

One-size-fits-all approach to child custody dangerous for mum, child




Child custody evaluators should know how to differentiate between types of violence – because a one-size-fits-all approach to custody can endanger both mums and kids, according to new American research.
The University of Illinois study reveals that evaluator’s beliefs generally fall into two categories, and one group is far more likely to prioritise safety for women and children when making custody decisions.
“Some evaluators see conflict as a natural part of relationships. When domestic violence occurs, they reason that it takes two to tango. When a couple’s relationship is over, these evaluators see no reason the mom and dad can’t co-parent safely, especially if they’ve both attended court-ordered anger management classes,” said Jennifer Hardesty, a U of I associate professor of human and community development.
“The other group believes that anger management classes work for some couples, but they also know that violence can be used to control and terrorize women, and that children may be used as pawns in the relationship or as weapons against the mother. In such cases, these evaluators carefully craft custody arrangements that will keep the mother and children safe,” said doctoral student Megan Haselschwerdt who worked with Hardesty on the study.
The researchers would like to see standardized and mandated training that would teach custody evaluators how to discriminate between types of violence because different kinds of violence require different interventions.
“Unfortunately, many courts are applying a one-size-fits-all model to custody cases. It’s important to err on the side of safety. Safety precautions can be relaxed if it turns out that there’s not as much of a risk as was thought. That’s better than just assuming that there’s no risk,” Haselschwerdt said.
In the study, 23 custody evaluators participated in in-depth interviews, answering open-ended questions about their beliefs and how they made decisions.
Members of the “it takes two to tango” school said that most of their cases involved situational violence or arguments that turned physical because couples were unable to manage their conflicts properly-for example, a heated conflict about finances that ended with a shove.
These custody evaluators acknowledged that extreme cases of battering exist but said they almost never saw them.
But Hardesty disagrees.
She said: “These evaluators described situations that clearly went beyond situational violence, but they were convinced that was all they were seeing.
“In fact, speaking up for her safety can backfire on a woman if an evaluator decides she is trying to alienate the father from his children by making exaggerated claims. The evaluator may then compensate by prioritizing the father’s custody rights.”
The more prevalent type of domestic violence is situational violence, which probably occurs in approximately 60 percent of the evaluators’ cases.
In at least another 30 percent of cases, described by scholars as intimate terrorism, one partner attempts to control the other through threats of violence and a willingness to follow up on them.
“Usually there are multiple forms of control-not allowing the partner to make any financial decisions, threatening to take the children away if the abuser’s demands aren’t met, emotional abuse, name calling, degrading or humiliating the other person-anything that would terrorize someone or make them feel less human,” Haselschwerdt said.
“Attempts to control could involve keeping a log of how far a partner has driven or checking their cell phone and where they’re going on the Internet. These sorts of monitoring behaviours become dangerous when they’re followed up with threats of violence,”
she said.
Hardesty added: “There are many models and templates for suggested ways to do these evaluations. They tell evaluators what kind of information they need, how many people they should talk to, and how much time they should devote to an evaluation, but there are no legal requirements for how they should actually be done.”

Friday, July 30, 2010

Brigitte Deel of Ashburn, VA is taken captive by her Sociopath Father Troy Deel






Brigitte Deel of Ashburn, VA is taken captive by her Sociopath Father Troy Deel
For over 6 years now.
Once abusers gain custody they then
isolate & estrange the children from
their Mothers.......


I found this letter of Troy Deel (sick minded sociopath Father) to Veronique (Brigitte’s loving Mom) so interesting….sounds familiar????
It’s Replica language of all abusers and mentally sick minded people.
Troy Deel; First of all take some spelling courses…too many misspelled words on the 1 page letter……..Or may be you were “ENRAGED” when writing this nasty letter.
By reading this letter we are all clear on which parent needs “Psychological counseling and medication.”
Mr. Troy Deel; we all think, you Definitely need Psychological attention.





Subject:
From: tadeel@comcast.com
Date: Thursday, July 22, 2010
Veronique,

Please do not show up on Saturday. This is not the way to get back into Brigitte's life. If you embarish her on Saturday, this will further deminish any chance of ever being a part of her life. Brigitte has grown into a wonderful person whose feelings you seem to not care about. You have been gone from her life for over six years. If you really want a chance with her you must start communicating with me and only me without hostility or anger. I will not allow you into her life unless you seek and continue for a sustained period of time certified physicological counseling and medication.

Furthermore, you are not allowed into Belmont. If I find you inside the gates I will have you arrested for tresspassing. These words should sound familiar as these are the last words you said to me the last time you saw Brigitte at your home July 4th weekend of 2004. You said to me "You and Brigitte are never allowed on my property ever again and if you do it will be tresspassing". You should remember this, I have. Up until that time I made every attempt to insure that Brigitte got to see you during your scheduled visitation. You were a no show on many occasions and several times I brought Brigitte to your home. I do not know what took place that holiday weekend during your visitation with Brigitte, but you must understand that Brigitte has never asked to come back to your home since that weekend. If she had, I would have brought her. Unless you take serious what I have said above your chances to have a normal relationship with Brigitte will not happen.

You have defamed and libeled my wife and I in public for several years now. Please stop. Do not send emails to Lisa's employer, my employer, my employers associates or anyone else connected to me or my wife. Any further defamation will cause me to take action. Please remove Lisa's name and my name from your blog. Your linkage to Shivani's Face Book must also be removed. Your public posting of Brigitte's picture without asking her did not sit well with her or her friends.

There's a good chance this email will only enrage you. It is my hope that it does not. It is my hope that you take what I have said above very seriously and seek help.

Sincerely,

Troy

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

SAVE MCKINLEY

Injustice in Judicial System
Full story here

I married a man almost 4 years ago that I was sure to be the man of my dreams. 1 year into the marriage I find out that I never really knew who he was. He became mentally and verbally abusive and nothing I ever did was good enough. Going behind me and cleaning even after I had done a fine job of it before. I felt he was OCD. But now, I feel he is a sociopath. I am not a doctor, but I feel like something is wrong with him. We have been going through a nasty divorce since Jan. 9th, 2009. We have nothing of substantial meaning to argue over. No real estate, no money, nothing of monetary value. All we share is our beautiful daughter, McKinley.

Weed out corruption and Negligence in Family Courts



EarlRichards
June 6, 2010
Any family court judge who grants custody of children to a wife-beater, should be charged with child dangerment.
If the wife-beater is a danger to his (ex)wife, then, he is a danger to her children. One does not need to have a law degree to know this. Family courts are powerful, secret societies. Wife-beating cases belong under the jurisdiction of a criminal court, and not the farce and fraud of a family court. If judicial immunity is not ended, then, the family court judges will keep-on breaking the law.
The family courts should be open to the public, to the press/media and to court watchdog organizations, especially in secret courts the deal with children, that have done away with court reporters and the evidence. The taxpayers are supporting these courts, so the public and the public's elected representatives should have access to the family court records, at any time and without delay, in the public interest and in the children's interest, to weed out corruption and negligence and to ensure that that the taxpayer's dollars are not being squandered.Less

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

Misconduct in Virginia Family Courts: American MothersPolitical Party

Misconduct in Virginia Family Courts: American MothersPolitical Party

American MothersPolitical Party


For all Mothers who have lost their children to abusers in and out of Family Court System.
Mothers across the world are uniting to expose the criminals of family court. We demand justice and equality within the system. We will discuss the impact that Responsible Fatherhood Initiatives have done to Motherhood. We will share what we have uncovered and who has been paid off. Please join us and share your story of family court nightmares!

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

help solve the crisis in the nation’s family courts


According to a conservative estimate by the Leadership Council


each year more than 58,000 children are ordered by family courts into unsupervised contact with physically or sexually abusive parents following divorce in the United States. (link to press release)
This crisis is larger than the one in the Catholic Church. It is also more dangerous. Children who are court ordered into the custody of their abuser have no one to turn to for help as these custody determinations are backed by the force of law.
What can you do to help solve the crisis in the nation’s family courts?
Find out about the domestic violence laws in your state. Most states prevent perpetrators of domestic violence from having custody or access. Is this law being upheld in your state? Join with others and work within your state to strengthen these laws.

Thursday, July 15, 2010

Why are mothers who are the victims of domestic violence losing custody of their children to the courts and to the child protection system?




Attorney General Eric Holder
to the National Summit on the Intersection of Domestic Violence
and Child Maltreatment
Tuesday, June 2, 2009

As a judge at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia I saw first hand the suffering and long-term trauma experienced by children exposed to violence.

-Why are mothers who are the victims of domestic violence losing custody of their children to the courts and to the child protection system?

-Why are children of color over-represented in the child protection system?

-Do children need a relationship with their fathers even when their fathers have been abusive to them and their mothers in the past? If so, what does that relationship look like?

I ask that you explore all of these things while always remembering that the needs of children who are exposed to violence are inextricably linked to the needs of mothers who are the victims of domestic violence.

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Children are more at risk with single Fathers than single Moms




If judges like Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County , Virginia were actually to consider what is the best interest for children, they wouldn’t be taken from their mothers and handed to fathers who seek sole custody (a typical request of abusive fathers, as found by the American Psychological Association’s Presidential Task Force Study on Violence in the Family), especially when mom had been the primary caregiver all along.

All these father’s groups are screaming about “fatherlessness” and our government is giving all these father’s groups BILLIONS of our tax dollars to promote “responsible fatherhood,” i.e. help fathers fight for custody in court. Don’t laugh…it happens.


Actually, the studies show that children (either sex) are at more risk with single fathers than they are with single mothers.

One statement in this study stood out to me, because it was particularly true in my situation…and I am sure others moms: “single mothers devoted a greater share of their household food expenditures to grains, vegetables, fruit, and milk, whereas single fathers spent more on food away from home and on alcohol.” Just one statement picked out of a 20 page report, but it rings so true.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Thursday, July 1, 2010


'Farm Team’

Substitute judges academy assembles candidates for future seats on the bench.
By Michael Lee PopeThursday, July 01, 2010


Imagine the scenario. You are sitting as a substitute judge and a prosecutor slams a code book down while making a dramatic point in a drunk-driving case. Do you fine her? What if some guy is hot under the collar about a traffic ticket and wants to use the courtroom as a forum to tell off the cop in public. What do you do?
Judging is full of lightning-speed judgments, often with tremendous consequences. That’s why Alexandria General District Court Chief Judge Becky Moore created the Substitute Judges Academy, inviting top lawyers from across the commonwealth to the city courthouse on King Street.
Described by one speaker as the "farm team" of candidates for future seats on the bench, participants swapped horror stories from the courtroom, learned about new laws that go into effect July 1 and sung Happy Birthday to the undisputed legal dean of Alexandria, Judge Daniel Fairfax O’Flaherty.
"Substitute judges with judicial education are better prepared to serve well in court," said Moore, who hosted the first substitute judges academy back in January. "I think it’s important to have as much judicial education for the substitute judges as possible."Lesson one: Learn the law. And starting this week, there are a whole lot of new ones. It’s part of the annual ritual in Virginia, when the actions of the General Assembly session earlier in the year becomes the law of the land.
Starting this week, sending spam e-mail messages is a crime and community centers are now considered gang-free school zones.
One of the more challenging new laws for the courts to consider is a new code section that outlaws sending obscene text messages."I think that one is probably unconstitutional," said attorney David Oblon, whose law partners include House Majority Leader Moran Griffith (R-8) and House Courts of Justice Chairman David Albo (R-42).
Oblon spoke to the institute about the raft of new laws, touring a legal landscape that included everything from the sublime to the ridiculous. Wearing a mask during the commission of a felony is now a crime, although cold weather is not one of the considerations that should be taken into account. People can carry concealed weapon into bars, although they are not allowed to drink while packing heat. Then there’s a host of new exemptions that Oblon called "exemption creep," including allowing people with suspended licenses to drive to church and adding the death penalty for those who kill a fire marshal and auxiliary police officers."This is death-penalty creep because every other group is going to step forward and say they deserve the exemption," said Oblon. "I would expect to see more of this in the future."SOMETIMES SPLIT-SECOND judicial decision-making can have drastic consequences for years and decades to come. Attorney Jim Clark recalled a routine marijuana case where the defendant wanted to waive counsel. He figured a night or two in jail was the path of least resistance, but Clark warned the pinch-hitting courthouse gang to consider the bigger picture."Gee, maybe I don’t have to tell my parents," Clark recalled the defendant explaining. "That can come back to haunt people 10 years later."Sometimes, judges make the wrong decision. This is what happed several years ago in Alexandria, when a teacher was killed after a protective order was denied. Commonwealth’s Attorney S. Randolph Sengel told the institute participants that nobody wants to see their name in a headline as the judge who released a defendant on bond before he commits a murder."The most serious cases are the easiest to figure out. The more difficult cases are not as serious ones, like petty larceny or trespass," said the elected prosecutor. "I think a healthy dose of common sense carries the day."Moore spoke to the institute about ethics in the courtroom, presenting a series of situations that the group is likely to consider while wearing the robe. Human nature being what it is, Moore said, Virginia’s courtrooms are full of boorish behavior and short-tempered litigants. She suggested de-escalating tense situations by taking a break or lowering the volume."I’ve noticed that the quieter I get," she said, "the more well-behaved they become."

Monday, June 28, 2010

Judge Leslie Alden Invents Non-existent Rules




Judge Leslie Alden allowed deceiving man to demonstrate forged Documents, under Oath.........

Judge Leslie Alden knowingly allowed perjured testimony in her court room.....


I have seen her invent non-existent rules and conditions concerning quantum merit (a type of contract case)…………..

It was clear to me that she really did not care all that much about what the law says, but was more interested in her own opinions of what the law should say. That is, she paid no respect to the precedents, but just made up "Alden's Law" to suit her own fancy.
The fake Driver’s License had the Holliday Inn Hotel address in Washington DC with the room number!!!!!!!! The forged Drivers license was too evident, like printing $3.00 bill and try to shop with it.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Iniquitous Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County




Iniquitous Judge Bruce D. White of Fairfax County

By: Karen Ann DeLuca

many women in Fairfax, myself included, somewhat broken and beaten down, can testify to feeling crushed in a tantamount manner, financially and spiritually, by judges who'd rather make quota than focus on doing their best in deciding a case.


Instead of reducing library hours and cutting school funding to save money, perhaps the judicial budget should be explored for savings and salaries reduced or tied into performance as rated by the taxpayers until the purpose of the courthouse is restored.

After trying for over a year, I finally, and quite unexpectedly, was granted an Order to Show Cause by the Chief Judge of the Circuit Court in Fairfax County against my ex husband for contempt. The issues involved would sound familiar to any divorced woman - tardy (or non-payment of) alimony (or child support), failure (twice) to keep current home or work information as required by the Final Decree, and in my case, a failure to sell the marital residence within 120 days of that document. The hearing was set for May 21st; I dutifully prepared and filed a Memorandum in support of my position.
On the appointed day, I drew Judge Bruce D. White. He was running late from the 10AM (law) docket session; by the time our case, scheduled for 11:30AM, and his last one for the day, was called, it was 1PM. I was given 15 minutes to present my fairly complicated argument, which contained infractions spanning over six years, and examine two witnesses. - (Fred Rejali) An impossible task. And needless to say, the Judge's decision was that I had not proven my case. Duh! How could I? I had barely scratched the surface when he called "time up!"
Leaving out the details of my ex's long pauses in "answering" my questions as a tactic in stalling and taking up time, or his attorney's resorting to, as his primary tactic, an attempt to soil my good name to "balance" things out, because, well, that's all he had, as I was sitting in the courtroom all I could think of was why was something as important as the issue of late (or non-payment) of alimony (or child support), relegated to so little judicial concern and attention?
There is something very wrong with a system that does not honor the provisions of its own orders, by way of allowing a litigant - and in most instances, still, a female one - to fully present a case for contravention and consequential damages. It begs the question, what good are judicial dictates, if, when someone does not abide by them, a complainant is held to such an impossible and nebulous standard that the resultant message from a judge is "who cares?" As a follow up corollary, then, just what good are courts?
Fifteen minutes is not enough time to prove a case that is far from simple. But what I found even more baffling is that during my hearing, not once did Judge White admonish my ex for his flagrant, longstanding and extensive violations of the Final Decree. I would like to think that this is not a "men stick together" thing, but the absence of a scolding, on a contempt Order issued by the Chief Judge, was glaring and disappointing.
The better course on issues such as violations severe enough to merit a Rule to Show Cause would be to routinely schedule the matter on a day other than Friday Motion Day, allow at least an hour, and let each side to present all their evidence before making a decision, which might even be taken under advisement. Otherwise, why bother issuing the Order to Show Cause in the first place, except to go through the motions, no pun intended, and cruelly leave the injured party in no better position than before. It would also be helpful if the judge came prepared and was familiar with the file; in my case, the silence in response to my query as to whether my Memorandum had been read spoke volumes.
A decision is only as good as the system that generates it. Some of that has to do with personnel; most of it with institutional procedures. It all equals bad judging, and from my perspective, it appears that women, particularly those that cannot afford high priced representation, those that need the court's assistance the most, are more often than not on the receiving end of its shafting.
Instead of reducing library hours and cutting school funding to save money, perhaps the judicial budget should be explored for savings and salaries reduced or tied into performance as rated by the taxpayers until the purpose of the courthouse is restored. The legal concerns of citizens paying the tab deserve quality handling, not the bum rush herding treatment that so many of us are familiar with in another broken system - health care. How both law and medicine are practiced impact people's lives. And while premature physical infirmities and death are a more obvious byproduct of a sick mode of operation, many women in Fairfax, myself included, somewhat broken and beaten down, can testify to feeling crushed in a tantamount manner, financially and spiritually, by judges who'd rather make quota than focus on doing their best in deciding a case.

Prejudiced Judge Teena Grodner

I tried to save PEOPLE FROM THIS JUDGE, BUT MY CRIES WENT UNHEARD AND FELL ON DEAF EARS. HAD THE DELEGATE THOMAS RUST MADE AN AFFORD TO LAUNCH AN INVESTIGATION YOUR DAUGHTER " Sydney"WOULD STILL BE ALIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WITH THAT SAID, IF YOU OR YOUR FAMILY NEED HARD CORE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT YOUR CLAIMS I HAVE EVIDENCE OF MY COMPLAINT I RENDERED TO DELEGATE THOMAS RUST ON MARCH 29, 2009 at approximately 10 am.
Prejudiced Judge Teena Grodner
The Bias Judge Teena D. Grodner feels as though she is making me pay for......... talking to a White Social Worker the way that I had spoken to her on March 15th of 2000. In all fairness the way I express myself is being up front and very blunt, especially if it concerns my only child.Read more: http://socyberty.com/work/my-fall-and-rise-in-fairfax-county-virginia-part-three/#ixzz0rmkQyzyM
In the middle of a nightmare…the Judge that ripped my only child away from me. Never thinking to have anymore children because I was mourning the loss of my first. This has been one of my most difficult challenges to prove the injustice that has been impeded upon me by, 1) The Four Police Officers 2) The Social Worker 3) The Judge; In Fairfax County Virginia. Part three.
Fred Rejali & Judge Teena Grodner.
As part three begins, I want my readers to feel all that I’ve been through. Believe me when I say,” This isn’t a matter of pulling the race card, it’s truly about revealing how our justice system allows BIAS authority figures to use their Power Of Authority to render down harsh and unusual punishment.” I cannot sit no longer while all those that was related to my case continue to be promoted for their Inaccurate Investigations, Fabricated testimonies, Kangaroo Court Room, Inappropriate Behavior, and Labeling me a racist.Read more: http://socyberty.com/work/my-fall-and-rise-in-fairfax-county-virginia-part-three/#ixzz0rmjy2V9P

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Teaching the Courts Their Alphabet


Teaching the Courts Their Alphabet
By: Karen DeLuca.Alexandria, Virginia


Editor, Times-Dispatch:

While campaigning, Bob McDonnell's "one new idea" was divestiture of the state liquor stores. Now, schools, social services, public safety, and state employee pensions are on the commonwealth's GPS. Virginia is for S's. Why not shift gears? Backpedal closer to the top of the alphabet, rather than fuel taxes and gun sales, and privatize the courts. Portions of their functions already are privatized -- for example, through the increased use of mediation. In many instances, a judge's signature is just a rubber-stamp of an out-of-court compromise or one party's position. With more legal issues being resolved the DIY way, there is less need for the traditional role of the judiciary, or for the pricey courthouses that garage them.
Or they could become self-funded, or the "public option" in a hybrid system, forced to upgrade the quality of their product to maintain traffic on the theory no one will pay for a lousy, accelerated job. This would mean parking the best, most experienced personnel in the lower courts, where decision-making is typically determinative. If litigants are satisfied below, such positioning could eliminate the need for some of the vast appellate bureaucracy -- more potential budget savings. Because here's the clunker we have now: There's the "avoidance canon," where judges either don't decide or rule on a ground which really doesn't resolve anything, but disposes of a matter to get it off their desk. Expensive and inconclusive for litigants who expect and deserve more than a drive on the road to nowhere.
Another major problem, at all levels, is law-clerk justice. Just out of school, a bunch of mostly 25-year-olds in training, making impactful decisions that their bosses blindly sign off on. As these rulings travel up the system, they are routinely rubber-stamped by more apprentices, who cover their peers' tracks in this self-interest network where everyone's paving the way for their next career move. A stop sign should be put to this extra-constitutional exercise of judicial power and payment of redundant salaries.
In a Virginia running on fumes, officials need to look past their blind spots to non-retread solutions. That includes the commonwealth's side street and back alley courts. It's as easy as A, B, See . . .
Karen DeLuca.

Alexandria.

My Judge was convicted of fraud and ....


"My Judge was convicted of fraud and still managed to ignore the law, deny me legal representation, and send my children to live with their abusive dad.

I had sole custody of the children (ages 13 & 16) since birth, they were both on honor roll and living well. The law was clearly ignored, despite the mountain of evidence presented at trial. I was given total decision making over education and therapeutic needs - basically, am required to babysit the dad and report back to court each time that he harasses the school -- so that I can be harassed again. Weekend visitation only. How do you start the process. So far my written complaints have been ignored. "

by: Carmen Coleman

One corrupt evil judge down and 100's to go


"One corrupt evil judge down, & 100's to go...

The judge who gave my ex husband custody of my two kids was later found to be on heroine & other illegal drugs, & used it quite regularly while doing his job.


He slept through most of the trial the day I lost my kids in 1998. (signs of heroine use) I got a recording of this trial because I wanted to prove that he slept through it, unfortunately the courts conveniantly cut out the part of him snoozing in the court video. And I didn't get 5 & a half hours of trial recording either, I think I was lucky to get 1 hour of the recording after they were done editing it.

There were reports that Judge Ray Harding Jr. was very abusive to his wife & children. He was sent to prison, for idk how long. But I was never able to get a retrial, no attorney I hired, dared to do it. And to this day, the 4th district court in Provo, Utah has nothing bad to say about Judge Ray Harding Jr. The heroine addict....> > I feel these Judges NEED to be held accountable for the decisions they make that destroy ppl's lives... It makes me sick to see the consequences of the rulings they make, after blatently ignoring evidence of abuse or threats made. Their decisions have effected too many children to count. Makes me wonder how they would feel if they got letters from some of these poor kids after they age out of the system, telling them how they destroyed their lives?... Maybe a class action law suit should be filed against all of them!> > Thank God this judge lemkau, will no longer beable to hurt or effect another child with his biased decisions.... Too bad an innocent life had to be lost to have him removed though.... I saw the mother of this child on the Dr. Phil show, I just wept when I heard her story. This never should have happened...."

We have suffered at the hands of Fairfax County Judges in the Family Court system


We have suffered at the hands of Fairfax County Judges in the Family Court system in 2006,and again in 2009.Hoe effective have you been in getting any action against this biasised and corrupt system?

Debra Woodward

Children took hostage by Corrupted Virginia Judicial System




Children took hostage by Corrupted Virginia Judicial System.


Scott D. Landry Esq. was appointed Guardian ad Litem


Good Afternoon,

My name is Lisa Parenti and I live in Midlothian, VA. My daughters were taken away from me on July 23, 2009. at the time my oldest daughter just turned 5 and my youngest was 10 months old.

I started dating my husband in September of 2001. The relationship was very rocky, but in July 2003 I found out I was pregnant with my first child. After I told him I was pregnant he packed up and moved to West Virginia with his dad. In October 2003, he contacted me and stated that he wanted to work things out and he wanted me to move to West Virginia, so I did in hopes that we could work things out and my child wold have a family. In March 2004 my daughter was born, in August 2004 we moved back to Virginia. The very next day he left us. He did not pay child support nor did he return until she was 2 years old. At that time he once again wanted to work things out and I went back to him and a month later we got married. in May 2007 i noticed a change in his behavior, he became increasingly verbally abusive, threatning, volitile and distructive. Often trowing furniture at me, calling me a "worthless piece of shit", and telling me " Do you have any idea how much easier my life would be if you were dead" He also started drinking heavily. In April 2008, I discovered that he was having an affair with our daughter's friends mother. After I found out his drinking and his behavior became even worse. On June 1, 2008, 6 months pregnant with my second child (whom he openly denied was his until she was 3 months old), I took my daughter and left him and went back to live with my parents. In August 2008 I deneid him visitation due to him constantly threatning me over the phone that he was gonna kill me. In September 2008 shortly before the birth of my second child I filed divorce papers. Scott D. Landry Esq. was appointed Guardian ad Litem in my case and, after lengthy trials and litigation from September 2008 through July 2008 of he and his mother stating that I abuse and neglect my children, which couldn't be further from the truth, and making him out to be the victim. he was awarded full physical custody of my children.

I see my girls once a week on Wednsdays from 6pm until 9am and every other weekend from Friday at 6pm until Monday at 9am. I am not allowed to be apart of my oldests education, or do any extra activities with my children. And 95% of my monthly salary goes to him for child support. He doesnt work and has a full time nanny at the house to take care of the children.

I am completley heartbroken. I went from being their primary caregiver (he did absolutley nothing for them or with them) to only having a limited amout of time with them while a nanny raises them.

This is a very long story and there is alot more detail, please feel free to contact me by email, or phone ........ Any information I can receive to help get my girls home will be greatly appreciated.

Thank you,

Lisa Parenti

Thursday, June 10, 2010

CFSA of DC Criminal, Corruption and Cover up




we have come across the little known fact that James P. Toscano, Esq., the General Counsel (top lawyers) for DC Child Protective Services (CFSA) has an arrest record in Arlington, Virginia for indecent exposure (masturbating in a urinal in a public bathroom (frequented by children) while looking into a bathroom stall) at a shopping Mall.


When a Child Protection Executive Employee is a sex offender, likelywith minors involved, should they remain in the public's trust and continue to work, especially when they use their influence to help suspected abusers to not be detected and accountable?

This arrest occurred 2004 when Mr. Toscano was an attorney recently transferred to Child Protective Services (CFSA) from the DC Attorney General’s office.

He was charged, and through his attorney who specializes in "park arrests" with sexual activity made a deal with the Arlington County Prosecutor that the charges would be dropped after he finishes a year of supervised probation and complete a sex offender evaluation.

After the one year probation, in 2005, the charges were dropped just before his scheduled trial.

Despite this arrest and the nature of the charges, Mr. James Toscano who works alongside the Director, Dr. Roque Gerald as an Executive who sets policy for all, and an employee arrest policy that states automatic termination, he is allowed to continue working at DC Child Protection Agency (CFSA) on children’s abuse cases. In addition, he was promoted in 2008 to the General Counsel of CFSA.

A 2007 memo of the then CFSA General Counsel stated that a Probation before Judgement (PBJ) for indecent exposure is grounds for termination — but Mr. Toscano was not terminated. As explained in the letter to Mr. Wells and Dr Gerald, Mr. Toscano has helped the suspected abuser by personally interfering and providing false information in at least one case helping to cause the investigation to be improperly done. Mr. Toscano actively worked to help the alleged abuser/neglectful parent and appeared to act beholden to the abuser’s attorney (who is from an old Arlington family and knows his way around its courthouse very well — and no doubt knew about Mr. Toscano’s background). In 2009 and 2010, Roy Morris, Esq. testified before the DC City Council Chair, Tommy Wells Committee regarding this matter twice, and in neither instance was there any followup or expression of concern from any DC officials.

They act as if they know all of this already, and are intent on doing nothing about it.The problem here is too obvious, based on the documentation attached.
James Toscano and Child Protective Services are intent to hide the truth from the public.

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Mothers of Lost Children Hold Silent Vigil at the White House

CNN iReport
Mothers from across the country gathered at the White House today on Mothers Day to stand in silent vigil for the children who are now in the custody of abusers.

CNN producer NCarroll is the founder of the Indianapolis chapter of this organization and posted these photos, telling me, 'We tried to all dress in white as a sign of peace (as the Liberian women in "Pray the Devil Back to Hell" did). We had about 120 participants. '- Thanks, CNN iReport producer

Raise awareness of this crisis in family courts
Children who are now in the custody of abusers.
Claims of domestic violence are often dismissed by family court judges during divorces or child custody proceedings, even though the American Bar Association found false claims to be rare.

AnneGrant
May 10, 2010
Thank you for spending your Mother's Day taking this urgent stand for children held hostage by custody courts and child protective agencies despite the best efforts of dedicated mothers to protect them.
Comments:
EarlRichards

June 6, 2010
Any family court judge who grants custody of children to a wife-beater, should be charged with child endangerment. If the wife-beater is a danger to his (ex)wife, then, he is a danger to her children. One does not need to have a law degree to know this. Family courts are powerful, secret societies. Wife-beating cases belong under the jurisdiction of a criminal court, and not the farce and fraud of a family court. If judicial immunity is not ended, then, the family court judges will keep-on breaking the law. The family courts should be open to the public, to the press/media and to court watchdog organizations, especially in secret courts the deal with children, that have done away with court reporters and the evidence. The taxpayers are supporting these courts, so the public and the public's elected representatives should have access to the family court records, at any time and without delay, in the public interest and in the children's interest, to weed out corruption and negligence and to ensure that that the taxpayer's dollars are not being squandered.

Monday, May 10, 2010

Battered Women Take Custody Battles to White House


By Mary Darcy

We News correspondent

Friday, May 7, 2010

Battered mothers often shy away from publicity. But this year, in a sign of their growing organization, some plan to spend Mother's Day in Washington in a White House vigil to draw attention to a court system that often gives custody to abusers.

(WOMENSENEWS)--On Mother's Day, busloads of battered moms and advocates for abused children will roll into Washington, D.C.

They'll hold a vigil outside the White House in an effort to persuade President Obama to take up their cause of reforming a family court system that they say all too often puts children into the hands of abusive parents.

For some it marks a new and somewhat frightening degree of public exposure. Some of the protesters will be shrouded in scarves, hiding from their abusers or a court system they fear will punish them for speaking out.

"They're whistleblowers," said vigil organizer Connie Valentine, policy director for The California Protective Custody Association, based in Sacramento. "The system doesn't look kindly on whistleblowers. It's a difficult situation because we have seen enormous judicial retaliation against mothers who step up in front of the problem."

Efforts to quantify the problem are just beginning but protective parents claim it is widespread. A study done by the Williamsburg, Va.-based American Judges Foundation in the early 1990s showed that in 70 percent of challenged cases, battering parents involved in custody battles persuaded authorities the victimized parent was unfit for sole custody, according to a spokesperson from the foundation.

Valentine and other advocates for protective parents call the family courts broken and corrupt and say the system not only puts children into the hands of abusive parents, it also bankrupts and punishes the protective parents who fight for them. At the same time, they say it's hard to reform the system because the people it hurts are hiding from abusers and anxious to avoid publicity.

Shifting Ground
But Valentine feels the ground shifting. "I think we're in the early stages of a civil rights movement for protecting children from physical and sexual abuse."

She said the Internet is helping battered mothers come together. "E-mail has helped. It's a good part of the reason for all of the advocacy," Valentine said. "Women are beginning to see that it's not their fault and that they are just pawns in the game."

Mo Hannah, psychology professor at Siena College, near Albany, N.Y., used the Internet to organize the first annual conference for battered women seeking custody in 2004, after her own difficult custody battle.

This past January marked the seventh gathering, which meets annually in Albany and is the major organizing and networking event of the year for protective parents.

"The first conference was about getting people to talk and validate their experiences," Hannah said. "But as the conferences continued it became very clear that we needed a national movement. Now the conference is just sort of an umbrella or structure that encourages people to share with each other."

Over the seven years, women have met at the conference and formed smaller groups, such as the Massachusetts Protective Mothers for Custodial Justice.

"Mass Moms," as it has come to be known, brings together women who have gone through custody battles with those currently in the throes. Volunteers accompany women to court and on lawyer visits and play a general shepherding role.

"We stand next to a woman who is fighting for her children while she pleads and receives orders," one Mass Mom told Women's eNews at January's Battered Mothers Custody Conference.

These volunteers have all been through their own custody battles and declined to be named for fear of retribution from their ex-husbands or the court system. Many have gag orders associated with their own cases. It is this type of fear of retribution that has helped keep the protective parents movement under the radar.
Fear Stands in the Way
The California Protective Custody Association's Valentine understands the fear that keeps women from protesting and fighting the bigger battles.

"I waited until my own children were grown so we weren't affected by the family court system," she said.

Valentine says advocates and organizers need to study and replicate the successful civil rights campaigns of the past.

"Slavery was ended with a good law but slavery wasn't ended because a good law happened to come about. The law happened because huge masses of people put their lives on the line and fought for it," Valentine said.

This year "Mass Moms" is preparing to add some more public activism to their advocacy with a demonstration taking place in Boston on a date to be announced soon. In what they're planning to call "Confetti," the moms will symbolically shred court-appointed guardian reports--which they feel are particularly unfair to protective parents--into little bits and toss them at the statehouse to call attention to the plight of protective mothers fighting for custody of their children.

In New York City, a group called V.O.W., or Voices of Women, has been working within the court system to try to provide legal counsel and one-on-one help for women. On a wider scale its mission is to "promote long-term systemic change by documenting institutional failures, testifying at hearings, creating position papers and meeting with local and state officials."

Both Valentine and Hannah say this is the right time to take the movement to the next level.

"The new president is a fatherless man with a good wife and they will hear us," said Valentine. "And if they don't hear us, Vice President Joe Biden worked on the violence against women act and he will hear us. And if they don't hear us we will keep going until they do hear us."

Mary Darcy is a multimedia producer/host and documentary filmmaker. She's a two time Gracie Award winner for her work with Kate Mulgrew on Herstory and The Sounds of Progress, public radio series about great women in science. Darcy is a co-owner in Uptown/Downtown Media, producers of Alloveralbany.com.



For more information:
Battered Mothers Custody Conference
http://www.batteredmotherscustodyconference.org/

Battered Mothers Custody Conference California Protective Parents Association http://www.protectiveparents.com/research.html

Note: Women's eNews is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites and the contents of site the link points to may change.